I wouldn't recommend scrolling down if your at the office.
![[Image: Chez1.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/Chez1.jpg)
![[Image: KzUe6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/KzUe6.jpg)
Apparently she lost 215lbs!
![[Image: Chez1.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/Chez1.jpg)
![[Image: KzUe6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/KzUe6.jpg)
Apparently she lost 215lbs!
![[Image: DMnCU.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/DMnCU.jpg)
Quote: (04-14-2012 11:29 AM)Chad Daring Wrote:
I'd put money on it, she probably did it hte lazy way and had a gastric bypass or started scarffing some crazy ass diet pills. If you drop weight naturally over a long period of time, the skin sag effect shouldn't be that extreme.
Quote: (04-14-2012 11:29 AM)Chad Daring Wrote:
I'd put money on it, she probably did it hte lazy way and had a gastric bypass or started scarffing some crazy ass diet pills. If you drop weight naturally over a long period of time, the skin sag effect shouldn't be that extreme.
Quote: (04-14-2012 02:12 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Stretch marks aren't that bad. I have some mild ones, where my pecs meet my shoulders, presumably from lifting. It's a badge of pride, of my triumph over my scrawny Jew genetics.
Quote: (04-14-2012 02:54 PM)Timoteo Wrote:
Quote: (04-14-2012 02:12 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Stretch marks aren't that bad. I have some mild ones, where my pecs meet my shoulders, presumably from lifting. It's a badge of pride, of my triumph over my scrawny Jew genetics.
But there's a big difference in seeing them on a man that got them from lifting, as opposed to a chick getting them from being sloppy, and having them on loose skin as opposed to tight skin.
Quote: (04-14-2012 03:03 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Quote: (04-14-2012 02:54 PM)Timoteo Wrote:
Quote: (04-14-2012 02:12 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Stretch marks aren't that bad. I have some mild ones, where my pecs meet my shoulders, presumably from lifting. It's a badge of pride, of my triumph over my scrawny Jew genetics.
But there's a big difference in seeing them on a man that got them from lifting, as opposed to a chick getting them from being sloppy, and having them on loose skin as opposed to tight skin.
I guess it depends where it is, but if I saw my stretch marks on a girl, I would not care at all. Though I googled stretch marks, and most of the pics are a lot worse than what I have.
This is about what mine looks like, the pec one. If you didn't look for it, you might not even notice it. (not my photo)
Quote: (04-14-2012 03:31 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:
The woman is still "skinny-fat" --she has no muscle tone, doesn't exercise, still has a high body fat level and low muscle level.
At least one person is advocating a non-surgical solution of exercise to increase her muscle level as the way to eliminate her loose skin.
Quote: (04-14-2012 03:44 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Quote: (04-14-2012 03:31 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:
The woman is still "skinny-fat" --she has no muscle tone, doesn't exercise, still has a high body fat level and low muscle level.
At least one person is advocating a non-surgical solution of exercise to increase her muscle level as the way to eliminate her loose skin.
Interesting link, will read in full later.
On that note, I've long wondered whether breast reductions due to back pain are a sham. Must they really resort to surgery? Couldn't a girl get on a regimen of squats, deadlifts and clean eating? She might be skinny-fat, with a lot of the fat stored in her breasts. Plus having a stronger, thicker back would go some way to alleviating the pain and discomfort of large breasts. A bigger stronger back and ass would give them more 'ballast' with which to carry their large breasts. Of course it'd be painful if you're thin and weak as hell and you've got 20 lbs of flesh hanging off your chest.
Every time I've asked people, they thought I was crazy, but they never seemed to honestly consider my proposal of strength training as a solution. Strength training isn't taken seriously at all within medicine anyway, so I guess it's not surprising.