I don't get this. There are a zillion free photos and videos of naked women online, yet men feel the need to pay women for looking sexy. Huh?
If looking at women is your thing, paying this girl is the equivalent of being able to get free gourmet food, yet insisting on giving McDonald's your cash for their questionable product.
To anyone who pays these women: The ENTIRE history of Playboy centerfolds can be accessed for free. Back before around 1990, these were natural, beautiful women, not the chemically-altered, surgically-corrected robots you see now.
Here's the late Janet Lupo. She went on to make money as a real estate agent and sure wasn't charging people on "Patreon" (although if there is anyone I would have paid to see, it would have been her).
P.S. - Isn't Patreon the company that bans people for having "incorrect" viewpoints? And yet they let this odd-looking girl do her thing for an audience that probably includes underage boys? Just wondering.
If looking at women is your thing, paying this girl is the equivalent of being able to get free gourmet food, yet insisting on giving McDonald's your cash for their questionable product.
To anyone who pays these women: The ENTIRE history of Playboy centerfolds can be accessed for free. Back before around 1990, these were natural, beautiful women, not the chemically-altered, surgically-corrected robots you see now.
Here's the late Janet Lupo. She went on to make money as a real estate agent and sure wasn't charging people on "Patreon" (although if there is anyone I would have paid to see, it would have been her).
P.S. - Isn't Patreon the company that bans people for having "incorrect" viewpoints? And yet they let this odd-looking girl do her thing for an audience that probably includes underage boys? Just wondering.