Quote: (12-09-2018 08:23 AM)BadBoyGamer Wrote:
Attractiveness is not only determined by looks. I would say that when it comes down to looks (psysical appearance as in muscle, fat, face, hair, grooming, clothes) only a certain "treshold" needs to be obtained. Once this point has been reached other qualities get priority. And I do not see any evidence for this "threshold" to be particulary high.
Or to put it into other words: As long as you are "not bad looking".
Other attractive qualities that are important are: dominance, strength, pre selection, initiative taking, self confidence, risk taking, fearlesssness, social freedom, emotional control, etc.
In a real life face to face interaction these qualities become a whole lot more important than looks. And when it comes to sex these qualities become even more important.
To put it into other words: A "hot" submissive guy is unattractive.
I would even say that these qualities can entirely negate "uglyness". Or in the negative completly negate "hotness".
On other hand money and social status have little to do with attractiveness. These are simply practical considerations which belong in the "Beta Bux" category. If money or status where attractive, I expect girls to masturbate to pictures of Mark Zuckerberg.
But I do agree that Tinder gives you a good idea about where you stand looks wise. However as I said, this be a biased dataset. Biased towards looks primarily and biased for girls that primarily select based on looks.
I agree 100 percent. Also, the people that choose to use tinder versus the ones that don't. I know many women that do not have tinder profiles.
Here is a good way to get your rating per picture on Horornot website (if anyone still uses it):
https://fb-eu1.hotornot.com/