[Flux]

(11-13-2018 10:56 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  

(11-13-2018 08:03 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

Women do the selecting for the most part, and they only want the good genes.

Interesting post, but it lacks many, many details.

Essentially you are saying women making the choice is a good thing. I'd say, look around today. Being part of the choice but heavily steered is far more accurate explanation of modern civilization. You act as if males also don't know what other males are good mates or good stock genetically (for their daughters).

Even in the "neanderthal" days the "good genes" won for far more reasons, simple and complex, than women "choosing."

Remember, empires in decline have women making many choices.

Yes, the Fate of Empires.

But this is not about women's nature being bad, because it helped us survive for 100,000+ years before there was civilization. A woman's nature isn't inherently bad, it actually fits a man's perfectly.

We have a society that is near collapse, but we are still perfect biological beings that have everything needed to survive and thrive. A society's cycle of life and death might be what's simply needed to keep things fresh, and might not be preventable beyond a stage.

This hypergamy theory has us viewing women as bad, when they are the opposite, and simply a product of their environment--their nature isn't bad, it's actually beautiful if properly nurtured.

Women are beautifully framed mirrors (some more than others), that reflect what's around them. They turn the strength of men into beauty and good, and their weakness into evil and degeneracy.