Attractive 21 y/o Uni student murdered by 37 y/o ex-bf she dated for one month
10-29-2018, 09:55 PM
One of the worst things about SJWs that I (and surely most others here) detest is this entire idea of "being offended". Sure, everybody technically has the right get offended at anything, but the SJWs have taken this idea and decided that the propagator, not the offendee, is responsible for being offended in every single case.
So when a guy tells a chick "you look great in that outfit" (sexual harassment!), or wears a Halloween costume that makes fun of Native Americans/disabled/etc (cultural appropriation!), he is the one responsible in their eyes. They have made it clear that the burden of being non-offensive is on YOU, rather than just maybe, the person being offended should get the fuck over it and quit being offended over stupid shit.
I've seen a similar concept play out sometimes on non-mainstream message boards, where people begin to propagate conspiracy theories such as the Earth being flat (!!!), or making edgy statements such as a 21-year old chick being culpable for her own murder, and when faced with backlash in response, claim that the burden of proof is on the responder for not providing "sufficient facts", not on themselves for posting comments that don't warrant a logical response.
Yes, you have the right to say mostly whatever you want. But just because you do doesn't mean people have to reply to you in a logical fashion.
I read your response to my earlier comment. With my multi-year financial background, I'll say this: Comparing mathematical modeling and handling of "tail risk" of a financial portfolio to how a human behaves in interaction with other humans isn't even comparing apples and oranges... its comparing apples and baseball fields.
Women are different than men, in that in many cases, especially in interactions with men, women are not rational. Women are emotional and can be "manipulated" by the right man. That is why social framework is so important in guiding how interactions between men/women occur, and why some places have more "traditional" women and others don't.
Perhaps one can argue that society failed this woman. She probably shouldn't have been in this situation to begin with, and this piece of shit should've never had the chance to do what he did.
I don't believe we are culpable as individuals for society's mistakes.
So when a guy tells a chick "you look great in that outfit" (sexual harassment!), or wears a Halloween costume that makes fun of Native Americans/disabled/etc (cultural appropriation!), he is the one responsible in their eyes. They have made it clear that the burden of being non-offensive is on YOU, rather than just maybe, the person being offended should get the fuck over it and quit being offended over stupid shit.
I've seen a similar concept play out sometimes on non-mainstream message boards, where people begin to propagate conspiracy theories such as the Earth being flat (!!!), or making edgy statements such as a 21-year old chick being culpable for her own murder, and when faced with backlash in response, claim that the burden of proof is on the responder for not providing "sufficient facts", not on themselves for posting comments that don't warrant a logical response.
Yes, you have the right to say mostly whatever you want. But just because you do doesn't mean people have to reply to you in a logical fashion.
I read your response to my earlier comment. With my multi-year financial background, I'll say this: Comparing mathematical modeling and handling of "tail risk" of a financial portfolio to how a human behaves in interaction with other humans isn't even comparing apples and oranges... its comparing apples and baseball fields.
Women are different than men, in that in many cases, especially in interactions with men, women are not rational. Women are emotional and can be "manipulated" by the right man. That is why social framework is so important in guiding how interactions between men/women occur, and why some places have more "traditional" women and others don't.
Perhaps one can argue that society failed this woman. She probably shouldn't have been in this situation to begin with, and this piece of shit should've never had the chance to do what he did.
I don't believe we are culpable as individuals for society's mistakes.