How do feminism, gays, Islam, false rape, broken families etc benefit Western elite?
01-18-2019, 04:50 AM
Contrary to technoutopia illusion, I think that globalists actually try to bring down western societies by overburdening their financial and social systems. Ever heard about the convergence doctrine? East and West become so similar, that NWO, One World, becomes possible.
Almost immediately after the collapse of communism, mass asylum immigration started (no economic arguments anymore, this is neither workers nor consumer immigration), Sweden being the best example. Collapse of economy, IQ lowering - all that means that we are going towards no technoutopia. By the way, society with high-level military technic and low-level consumer technic can exist - that was Soviet Union.
You could look at the Western society as, of example, Sweden, as a low-entropy society. However, in the coming world of resources running low, it will be hard to keep low-entropy society running, since keeping low entropy demands high energy input. So we are crashing towards high-entropy society.
The problem with technological society is that it is not a static one, it must move forward. It is not feasible anymore in the world of scarce resources. Technology was supposed to be a bit like Euro currency was supposed to work: by creating pressure to move upwards, Greece was supposed to become so efficient like Germany, Third World countries were supposed to become like Sweden or UK. Well, we know how it all turned out. The system dynamics is towards higher, not lower entropy.
The Roman Emperor Vespasian once bought plans of a technical invention in order to destroy it, since he believed that this invention would take jobs and destroy a stable social structure.
I wonder how deeply entrenched economical explanations are in the Western mindset. An example: after it became kind of hard to believe that mass immigration is just new workforce, the new meme has appeared that immigrants are primarily new consumers because of low birth rate in the West. Really? Women surely felt to be extremely respected and pandered to, knowing that society is ready to go to such extremes just to protect her 'freedom of the womb'. That such explanation (taking low birth rates for granted) could ever be mounted simply shows how laughable all that is, but also how powerful women became in the West. Well, since low birth rates are neither really granted nor inevitable, nothing which follows from this presumption, whether immigration, consumerism, can be really a truthful argument, right?!
Almost immediately after the collapse of communism, mass asylum immigration started (no economic arguments anymore, this is neither workers nor consumer immigration), Sweden being the best example. Collapse of economy, IQ lowering - all that means that we are going towards no technoutopia. By the way, society with high-level military technic and low-level consumer technic can exist - that was Soviet Union.
You could look at the Western society as, of example, Sweden, as a low-entropy society. However, in the coming world of resources running low, it will be hard to keep low-entropy society running, since keeping low entropy demands high energy input. So we are crashing towards high-entropy society.
The problem with technological society is that it is not a static one, it must move forward. It is not feasible anymore in the world of scarce resources. Technology was supposed to be a bit like Euro currency was supposed to work: by creating pressure to move upwards, Greece was supposed to become so efficient like Germany, Third World countries were supposed to become like Sweden or UK. Well, we know how it all turned out. The system dynamics is towards higher, not lower entropy.
The Roman Emperor Vespasian once bought plans of a technical invention in order to destroy it, since he believed that this invention would take jobs and destroy a stable social structure.
I wonder how deeply entrenched economical explanations are in the Western mindset. An example: after it became kind of hard to believe that mass immigration is just new workforce, the new meme has appeared that immigrants are primarily new consumers because of low birth rate in the West. Really? Women surely felt to be extremely respected and pandered to, knowing that society is ready to go to such extremes just to protect her 'freedom of the womb'. That such explanation (taking low birth rates for granted) could ever be mounted simply shows how laughable all that is, but also how powerful women became in the West. Well, since low birth rates are neither really granted nor inevitable, nothing which follows from this presumption, whether immigration, consumerism, can be really a truthful argument, right?!