Quote: (09-16-2018 11:57 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:
I have noticed over the last 5 years a series of married friends in their mid 30s who got vasectomies at the urging of their wives. The goal is so their wives do not have to take a pill or whatnot for 5 - 10 years until they naturally become infertile. The 'deal' is that their wives promise that this is the reason that they are not getting enough sex, and after the surgery will give them more.
Recently I have seen one of these men get divorced. Now if they want to find a younger woman with a lower notch count and start over, they will have to have it reversed.
My brother told me that this is the final step to total submission to the wife. This is womans' way of eliminating a key piece of leverage that men have to maintain the balance in the relationship. That if she is a shitty wife, you still can't go get another girl pregnant or leave her. This keeps a little bit of competition and fear into the relationship, which partially restores the balance back to the man in that even when the woman becomes infertile, the man retains this capability.
Although I do not think I would ever have a vasectomy personally, I would call this a blue pill vasectomy, vs. a red pill vasectomy where a the man simply does not want to have any more kids himself and wants to bang without risk.
Any insights or thoughts you have into this would be appreciated. Would you advise these married men to refuse this blue pill vasectomy? Is this a warning sign of being fully cucked, that she is actually wanting her man to be powerless? Is it a warning sign that from your wife that she does not ever want to even risk becoming impregnated again by you?
It's definitely a red flag if the wife would want him to have a vasectomy, especially if it's her idea. One of the reason for marriage is to bring the man's children into a stable household.