Quote: (09-19-2018 11:01 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:
Quote: (09-17-2018 04:15 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
< Because Western countries are owned by globalist masters who already consider themselves as the Owners of the Planet. What they are doing right now is just consolidating their control. To them it's just a money transfer from their province UK to their province in Pakistan and India.
The underlying machinations are what matters to them to attain their final goal of a Brave New One World Government that they can ultimately steer from afar. The West is just a piggy bank plus on the demographic extermination list since they might rebel against them some day, so they better make sure to make Whites all minorities in their homecountries while preaching compassion, Christian values of inclusion, open borders, individualism, more classical liberalism etc.
Problem is of course that the other side as well as the other Muslim and shitizen groups are not going to be ever classical liberalists.
There is enough money to pay for basic health care in the West - heck - if you allowed more for prevention, then there would be much more, but this is not about money. There is always money for refugees. Remember the stink that Germany made over the billions it had to pay for Greek debt? Literally one year later it all did not matter since Germany happily took in shitizens that cost them 100 bio. $/year easily (40 bio. $ that they admit to). So Germany took in obligations that will cost them more than the ENTIRE GREEK DEBT within 4-5 years! Suddenly money was no issue. So essentially Germany could have easily paid the entire principal payments and interest rate payments for Greeks and it would still be cheaper than accepting half the inbred terrorist rapists!
Plus a lot of money that does go into Military spending seem to be siphoned off into various things:
Quote:Quote:
According to a recent report from Federal News Radio, the Pentagon spent $21 billion on 148 OTAs between 2015 and 2017. This number, obtained via the Pentagon’s public affairs office, is at odds with the $4.2 billion logged by the Federal Procurement Data System. So why does the DoD give two different numbers on OTA spending? Because OTAs are not subject to the regulatory and disclosure guidelines required for most contracts, the Pentagon can get away with not reporting them as procurements—in other words, as part of the grand total.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...on-budget/
Quote:Quote:
The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post.
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified “a clear path” for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.
The study was produced last year by the Defense Business Board, a federal advisory panel of corporate executives, and consultants from McKinsey and Company. Based on reams of personnel and cost data, their report revealed for the first time that the Pentagon was spending almost a quarter of its $580 billion budget on overhead and core business operations such as accounting, human resources, logistics and property management.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investiga...351eed67bc
Conservatives really want to be fiscally conservative but seems that they leave the waste in the military out of the accounting. Likewise waging a far less effective campaign in Syria than Russia with much higher costs.
That's because they're too busy genuflecting to anything in a U.S. uniform and saying that stupid cliche "Thank you for your service."
I respect the military. I respect the police. But what I DON'T do is fetishize and idealize both these institutions and behave like they can do no wrong.
I see too many conservatives do this. Not the people here (who have good critical thinking skills), but the fat, bloated, middle-aged cuckservative types with high-pitched geeky voices. They're the type you hear on talk radio that call everyone "Gentleman," even cold-blooded killers. Actual example: "Yes, I'd like to address the issue of the gentleman who shot the child in broad daylight in Baltimore City."
Yes, I'm sure he was a real fucking "gentleman." Why don't we think him for his service too?