Quote: (09-10-2018 10:02 PM)ms224 Wrote:
Roosh, how is this not similar to a SLAAP suit?
Some entity pretends to be defamed, then uses its position to silence you via a third part
I'm not even remotely pretending to be a lawyer but this smells very shaky legal ground. Furthermore, you
have a means to show financial damages.
Call someone like marc radanzaa and see what they say.
Discovery between amazon and huffpost should be interesting, to say the least. If it turns out they are in fact cordinating
i think this would have major implications.
Again, if your livestream and youtube stuff falls into consitutionally protected speech, and youtube is a public place, how is this not a
test case to expand Marshal to the online sphere?
Beinvineto, thats just fucked up in all possible respects. When the president says shitholes, I think this is what he means.
Whats fucked up is that this left wing Californian feminist professor took part and all she ever got from it was academic promotion, fellowship and acclaim whilst Amazon uncritically continue to sell the book.
(Personally, I think she should be allowed to sell the book but then so should Roosh be able to sell his comparatively mild tome. This is the same Amazon that sells Mein Kampf after all)
Roosh, to go with everything else, this is another stick to beat Amazon with.