Roosh, how is this not similar to a SLAAP suit?
Some entity pretends to be defamed, then uses its position to silence you via a third part
I'm not even remotely pretending to be a lawyer but this smells very shaky legal ground. Furthermore, you
have a means to show financial damages.
Call someone like marc radanzaa and see what they say.
Discovery between amazon and huffpost should be interesting, to say the least. If it turns out they are in fact cordinating
i think this would have major implications.
Again, if your livestream and youtube stuff falls into consitutionally protected speech, and youtube is a public place, how is this not a
test case to expand Marshal to the online sphere?
Beinvineto, thats just fucked up in all possible respects. When the president says shitholes, I think this is what he means.
Some entity pretends to be defamed, then uses its position to silence you via a third part
I'm not even remotely pretending to be a lawyer but this smells very shaky legal ground. Furthermore, you
have a means to show financial damages.
Call someone like marc radanzaa and see what they say.
Discovery between amazon and huffpost should be interesting, to say the least. If it turns out they are in fact cordinating
i think this would have major implications.
Again, if your livestream and youtube stuff falls into consitutionally protected speech, and youtube is a public place, how is this not a
test case to expand Marshal to the online sphere?
Beinvineto, thats just fucked up in all possible respects. When the president says shitholes, I think this is what he means.