Quote: (09-05-2018 12:55 AM)icyT Wrote:
Year by year as men are attracted to 18... 17... 16... even if merely as a glance rather than to approach, progressively more feminist will start using words like pedophile to describe him, proper medical definitions be damned.
They are willing to make baby-rapers feel more accepted and less alone by making them wrongly think there are more of them than there actually are, if it means being able to shame men who shun roasties and the ability to drive society into a panic.
Yes absolutely. Men attracted to women who are several years into puberty (breasts, hips, etc) aren't pedophiles, they're just heterosexual. Forcing them to pretend that 16 year old girls aren't hot does a million times more harm than good. Prudes, insecure roasties and feminists like this pretense because it means men must actually be attracted to their gnarled, sagging bodies.
Really, it just eliminates barriers and scrutiny that should exist when adult men interact with teen girls. Most women are very interested in sex by that age and would have their first pregnancy around 16 historically. There is absolutely nothing abnormal or wrong with wanting to date them. A man who openly says he has romantic interests in a girl, and insists on behaving like a gentleman with her, is infinitely more trustworthy than some molesting "mentor", step father, sports coach, teacher etc.
The molesting gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar relied on this dynamic. Several of the gymnast girls actually loudly spoke up that he was fingering them during "therapy", but were ignored by older women and their own parents, because how could any man be interested in these teen girls? If anything, the doctor is interested in their beautiful overweight single 40 year old mothers, right? Go to 1:25 in this video:
Interesting how roasties, feminists, and child molesters seem to agree on certain key issues.