I'm actually starting to see why the radical control feminist set is so fervently against things like sex dolls and sex bots. I wouldn't doubt if this is a successful business. We already know that the sale of sex dolls is profitable enough to create an industry with several competing companies.
Consider this. When I was researching sex workers who specifically dealt with client side sex (read: escorts, but many were also porn stars), there was a consistent apprehension about the long-term viability of the whoring market. Prices were way down and this was a number of years ago.
You could undoubtedly buy yourself an hour with a recognizable pornstar for less than the $960 mentioned in the article. But, men will go the sex doll and sex bot route instead. Again, we have already seen this. Men buying $ 10,000 stationary sex dolls. How many soft prostitution arrangements could you get for that amount of money (and, from college age girls for that matter). But, again, the men go for the artificial.
I'm no MGTOW and, to be honest, I have reason (and research) to disagree with some of the more negative prognosticating within the larger Red Pill community. However, I do think that there is a coming seismic shift in the marriage market. Small (sometimes very small) disruptions in the demographic numbers can cause huge changes. Imagine, for example, if I waved a magic wand and removed 5% of single males from the planet (or the US, if you like). There would be nothing special about these men other than they would be young(ish), single, and otherwise chosen at random (so we are not getting the bottom 5% of men). Paced forward a decade or two, this would cause a cascade of negative effects in the marriage market. Those effects would, obviously, primarily be borne by women. This is akin to the stuff predicted in The Misandry Bubble, what, ten years ago?
Incels (and various other "cels") and MGTOW and other related groups exist. At least some of those men are going to remain in their fold permanently and things like this facilitate that entropy. As has been pointed out by members of this forum and callers on Roosh's Sunday Fireside Chats, there are, at least, some men who eschew women who fit in to the conventionally attractive category. I witnessed this myself when I was researching this area.
This is just one of many signs of things to come. And, it is a small sign at that. But, I predict that we may see (perhaps in several decades) a collapse and reconfiguring of the marriage market so extreme that the outcome no longer resembles what we now consider "marriage".
Consider this. When I was researching sex workers who specifically dealt with client side sex (read: escorts, but many were also porn stars), there was a consistent apprehension about the long-term viability of the whoring market. Prices were way down and this was a number of years ago.
You could undoubtedly buy yourself an hour with a recognizable pornstar for less than the $960 mentioned in the article. But, men will go the sex doll and sex bot route instead. Again, we have already seen this. Men buying $ 10,000 stationary sex dolls. How many soft prostitution arrangements could you get for that amount of money (and, from college age girls for that matter). But, again, the men go for the artificial.
I'm no MGTOW and, to be honest, I have reason (and research) to disagree with some of the more negative prognosticating within the larger Red Pill community. However, I do think that there is a coming seismic shift in the marriage market. Small (sometimes very small) disruptions in the demographic numbers can cause huge changes. Imagine, for example, if I waved a magic wand and removed 5% of single males from the planet (or the US, if you like). There would be nothing special about these men other than they would be young(ish), single, and otherwise chosen at random (so we are not getting the bottom 5% of men). Paced forward a decade or two, this would cause a cascade of negative effects in the marriage market. Those effects would, obviously, primarily be borne by women. This is akin to the stuff predicted in The Misandry Bubble, what, ten years ago?
Incels (and various other "cels") and MGTOW and other related groups exist. At least some of those men are going to remain in their fold permanently and things like this facilitate that entropy. As has been pointed out by members of this forum and callers on Roosh's Sunday Fireside Chats, there are, at least, some men who eschew women who fit in to the conventionally attractive category. I witnessed this myself when I was researching this area.
This is just one of many signs of things to come. And, it is a small sign at that. But, I predict that we may see (perhaps in several decades) a collapse and reconfiguring of the marriage market so extreme that the outcome no longer resembles what we now consider "marriage".
Currently out of office.