Quote: (07-25-2018 09:33 AM)RIslander Wrote:
Quote: (07-25-2018 09:29 AM)HornyRamone Wrote:
All feminists are insane. Good riddance to human rot that's now physically rotting six feet under.
That's harsh. Wouldn't you say radical feminism is actually the fault of the men in her society? Women are, after all, simply large children.
Let me address this.
In no way, ever, is Feminism even remotely men's fault. However, it's not the fault of childlike women either.
Here is my theory, feel free to pick this apart:
Feminism is very easily identified as a movement created by lesbians specifically to get their revenge on married (pretty) women. Lesbians and various other ugly/angry women, usually very intelligent (high IQs) but emotionally stunted by the hate they feel for being ignored by men and other cute women in high school.
Women have always had their own "society". Men don't control women's society...we manage the infrastructure, the buildings, the food supply, the military...we are the builders of the structure. But women "inhabit" our structure with their own rules and systems. They tell us what they want, we build it. But they are in charge.
Women's society has 3 groups in my view:
-20% of women are naturally happy, sweet, and love everything about having relationships men. They are naturally "evangelists" for their love of men. These women are universally successful in every society in every age. They are "happy".
-60% of women are neutral. They can have good relationships with men or not, depending on where they are led. They are "sheep". Women are naturally inclined to follow the herd, so control of this group is important.
-20% of women are ugly or have angry/resentful/egotistical personalities that make it impossible for them to build successful relationships with men. They are "witches".
For most of human history, the "20% happy" women were in charge. They ran women's society. The 60% sheep-like women followed their rules. Women's society was based on the idea of building and maintaining healthy relationships with men...just as a jockey must build a successful relationship with his prizewinning stallion racehorse. Life was harsh, starvation and disease were rampant, technology didn't exist. Without relationships with men, women and children would instantly starve. Women ran their local villages with an iron fist, to ensure the survival of the community.
The 20% of women who were ugly/angry could never succeed in this Woman's society, they were the losers, the outcasts, the witches and the spinsters. Not having husbands and children, they starved quickly. Married, successful women made sure their daughters were kept far, far away from these witches, so that their hatred of men (which can be seductive) would not spread. If witches/lesbians got too much power, they were killed. See my post on witches.
What happened in the 1960s was, the 20% ugly/angry women created Feminism and used modern PR techniques ("big lies") to slowly, gradually lure the 60% sheep-like women over to their side. Part of this is that the 20% happy women lost interest in preventing this perversion. With modern society, they no longer have to be as careful to prevent collapse of women's society. They can just marry millionaires (which is what the top 20% of happy women do) and enjoy their lives. So the witches were allowed to take over.
What we have now is that the balance of power in female society has shifted fundamentally. 80% of women now hate men. The witches are in charge of the sheep. If Hillary had won, they would have had control of the nuclear arsenal. This has never happened before.
Nobody knows what is going to happen now. But the 20/60/20 model is useful to remember.