[jeffreyjerpp]

(07-10-2018 07:11 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

The 1950s: Being with men is sinful!

The 1980s: Being with men will get you AIDS!

The 2010s: Being with men is "unsafe."

These are all different versions of the same tune, brought to you by The Junior Anti-Sex League.

All three of these propaganda-driven ideas are complete fiction, by the way. "Sin" is an invention of the church; AIDS never exploded into the straight community (despite massive media warnings); and most men are not dangerous criminals in any way.

The question is: What drives this sort of thinking? Do the people behind these ideas not want men and women to get together for some reason (Globalist economic ideas; fear of our primal biology) or do they just despise men?

I somewhat disagree that these are all "different versions of the same tune", since there were very, very good reasons to discourage sex before marriage, when birth control did not exist.

HoweverI agree that modern "sex is dangerous/evil/sinful!" initiatives come from different groups who all have one thing in common. The groups are varied, some are "conservative" and religious, others are hardcore left wing feminists, but they are all singing the same tune, as you put it.

They are genetic misfires who subconsciously fear losing the game of reproduction, and use deception, social engineering, and manipulation to try and stop anyone else from winning.

Deeply maladjusted kids at my college would often join the weirdo christian youth group, and promise never to have sex. Or, they would become "bicurious". Or, they would become feminist "anti-rape" crusaders. In all cases, they were the bottom of the barrel and totally neurotic. In medieval Europe, these people were sent to a monastery or convent, where they were conveniently never heard from again. We probably need something similar now.