Quote: (06-22-2018 04:45 PM)Eugenics Wrote:
Like I said they are co-dependant. It's obvious when you look at things like The Halo Effect. People of better genetic quality will be richer on average than those with less looks, intelligence, and cunning. But I'm basing my observation on the fact that many middle class and below women (sometimes even higher status women) will hook up and have children with felons, dregs, and other undesirables, despite the societal pressure not to. Almost as if they are being directed by by their base instincts exclusively. That success is based on genetic quality and the "bad boy" factor (agression related to testosterone is genetic and high t men are rates more attractive on average). They are sexually successful despite absence of any provider qualities whatsoever.
There's a lot of Tinder experiments that aren't so scientific but essentially prove this. I'll see if I can find them. But basically someone takes pictures of male models, admits to horrible acts that society condemns like armed robbery, pedophilia, murder, (openly on the tinder profile) and women still throw themselves at him. Not just ugly low status women either, but decent looking middle class girls. With such verocity it's almost depressing. Let me find some examples.
Here's one.
It's important to remember that all desires to have sex come from a need and urge to mate and procreate. Human psychology hasn't accepted contraception yet in it's base processes. The human need to mate and breed isn't fully caught up to consciousness on a mid level. It's not logical, it's instinctual and emotional and that is the plane that women exist on.
Tinder "experiments"
You made a huge fatally flawed leap from "aren't so scientific" to "essentially prove " xyz. The age of consent in the U.K. is 16, so breaking the rule by a few days is hardly some huge crime in most people's minds. For all they know he was 16 or 17 at the time. Change that age to 12 and remove the facetious tone ("beef curtain cunts," is real serious) and see how many eager matches he has. Even then, with hundreds or thousands of matches you can still cherry pick some girls who just looked at his pics or misinterpreted his description. It doesn't prove anything but it makes for some nice click bait entertainment.
Motivations for sex
This is a massive over simplification of human psychology. Motivations for sex aren't so one dimensional even if they originated out of a drive for reproduction. Sexual behavior has evolved as a social behavior to maintain and reinforce bonds between people. Strong affectionate relationships are more optimal to raise children to adulthood.
Humans modern and prehistoric clearly had sex for reasons other than just reproduction. Some people do it purely for validation, or for money/resources, or even conflict resolution within a relationship. A similar phenomenon is seen in our not so distant relatives, the Bonobos (who resolve the majority of conflicts with sex).