Studying 19th century Europe and the lives of those that lived in it (artists, aristocrats etc.), it becomes quickly apparent how the many ‘courtesans’ and ‘mistresses’ they all used to have are the exact equivalent of today’s promiscuous women. Even in the allegedly sexually repressed and conservative 1800s composer Franz Liszt among others seems to have had plenty a taste of female nature. The stories are so similar to what would happen today it makes you think we’ve never changed: the amount of cuckoldry is astounding. If you were an unattractive husband the chances of your wife having an affair were a certainty.
I’m playing with the theory that no matter what a society does, women will always find a way to fulfill their nature, and those that do not, perhaps never had that sexual nature to begin with.
If nature does in fact trump nurture then we have absolutely nothing to complain about—things will never change. Perhaps the 50s in America were just a facade that hid serially cheating housewives, cuck beta husbands, and the Chad husbands that cleaned up.
Nature always seems to find a way no matter how rigid the society, as if all the games we play are meaningless—simply play acting to fit in. We can try to ‘social engineer’ all we want but we can’t change a thing.
This is a good thing.
I’m playing with the theory that no matter what a society does, women will always find a way to fulfill their nature, and those that do not, perhaps never had that sexual nature to begin with.
If nature does in fact trump nurture then we have absolutely nothing to complain about—things will never change. Perhaps the 50s in America were just a facade that hid serially cheating housewives, cuck beta husbands, and the Chad husbands that cleaned up.
Nature always seems to find a way no matter how rigid the society, as if all the games we play are meaningless—simply play acting to fit in. We can try to ‘social engineer’ all we want but we can’t change a thing.
This is a good thing.