[Barron]

(06-07-2018 08:02 AM)Matt3B Wrote:  

We live in communities. We protect one another in the face of danger, and we all want that for the communities we live in.

Ever been to London? It's anything but a community.
It's a culturally and racially diverse, crime ridden hell hole. People are afraid to go outside, expecting them to intervene in any type of attack is ridiculous. Their own mayor even told them that terrorist attacks come with living in a big city. Sorry but you're logic applies only to small-town cultural and racially homogeneous communities.

Even the Rotherham police refused to get involved in the sex trafficking of hundreds of teenage girls because they were afraid of the repercussions of doing their job.

(06-07-2018 08:02 AM)Matt3B Wrote:  

We don't want thugs walking around threatening people and having the rest of the community cower in the face of danger. That's not a strong community.

Actually they do. This is exactly what they want because it's exactly what they voted for. Getting involved would have meant going against the democratically elected regime of London. Londoners have put their trust in the state and the state is giving them exactly what they wanted. This woman only wants more of it. Remember, she's blaming the "white" "male" bystanders, not the attacker who is a product of the state she supports.