"lesbian" porn whores jump on the #me too bandwagon, then the truth comes out NSFW
04-19-2018, 01:41 AM
I know, we're supposed to frown on porn and all of that stuff. I get it. But this story is interesting not because it involves porn, but because porn producers understand the women they work with on a daily basis, and as a precaution, from the moment the whore shows up to "work", until the time her suitcase pimp/jealous dyke "wife" comes to pick her up, she's being recorded on camera.
Here's the first part of the story from last month. This link is probably NSFW.
http://mikesouth.com/porn-stars/consent-...ers-22183/
Here's the TL;DR version. A new site is shooting content to get started. They bring in a known and reliable stunt cock from vegas to LA to shoot a scene. The whore scheduled to shoot the scene flaked at the last minute. Stunt cock was on good terms with some other whores in LA and texts one to see if she wants to shoot a scene. The whore agrees. The scene is performed. Everyone leaves. A few days later, the whore has gone to the police accusing stunt cock and producer/director of abuse, assault, etc. Whore and her "wife" put up a video on youtube taking their allegations public. They go on twitter as well and a shitstorm ensues. All the usual stuff. Most everyone believes the whore. Detractors are shouted down, and stunt cock is unable to find work.
A week ago the truth was revealed. (I just heard about this tonight due to a super condensed version of the events being recently posted on efukt). As I said, the whore went to the police. So the police contacted the producer so they could talk to him. He went to the station with the full video of her from the moment she arrived, until the time she left. It was about 2 hours and 40 minutes. A few hours later, the producer left the police station. No further witnesses were questioned, and no charges have been filed.
Again, this link is probably NSFW.
http://mikesouth.com/industry/everything...deo-22427/
So what's the rest of the story?
Leigh Raven and Nikki Hearts are scissor sisters a same sex married couple who both get fucked on film to pay the rent. Leigh Raven is the one who shot the scene in question. The stunt cock knew both of them and had hung out with them on a prior trip to LA. Nikki Hearts even mentioned having a bit of a crush on the stunt cock (i think this is critical info). He calls Raven to shoot a scene when the original whore flaked. She enthusiastically agreed. I think this shit got started because Hearts was jealous that her "wife" got called to get fucked by a guy she was attracted to.
To make a long story short, everything they alleged happened was proven false in the full video. Hearts clearly appears to be behind this. In some ways, she's been more vocal than Raven. This quote sums up why this is relevant as many women likely harbor this view in the age of social media.
"Raven’s wife, Nikki Hearts, has led the charge against us on social media, and one of the most troubling aspects of this incident is that Ms. Hearts has expressed the view that the actual video evidence should be ignored in favor of her and Raven’s construction of the incident made after the fact."
Fuck black and white evidence, all that matters is my feelings.
Throughout the full video, the director, producer, and stunt cock display a much higher level of professionalism than one would ever expect on a porn set. They make it absolutely clear what will happen, the general them of the video, etc. They seek her consent on virtually every activity they will engage in, and they do so repeatedly. They tell her exactly how to let them know if she's uncomfortable in any way. There is never a moment of doubt as to whether or not she consents in all of this. She clearly does, and does it with enthusiasm.
Hearts ("victim's" "wife") says that Raven's cheerful demeanor was a survival technique to buy her time to get out of there. Which of course begs this question.
"Our response to this all-too convenient claim is to ask: if behaving as though one consents, having a positive, cheerful demeanor, and refusing to take a director up on his offer to call for a ”cut” in the action if a boundary is overstepped, constitutes behavior that is not to be trusted or believed, then how could anyone on the set have known that she was (allegedly) distraught or experiencing intolerable discomfort?"
And why have I started a thread about the porn industry? How is this relevant to us? The next quote explains it.
"And moreover, we ask: by the standard Hearts and Raven propose, what behavior would EVER constitute proof of “real” consent? What Hearts and Raven propound doesn’t merely attempt to rescind or invalidate consent, it un-defines consent as a concept. "
In essence, female logic suggests that consent is an abstract concept that women can define at their discretion. And fuck your reputation.
In the aftermath, I'm not sure if the director, producer, and stunt cock have been back to work. According to the article, despite the industry's initial support for the whores in question, Nikki Hearts, the jealous "wife" of the "victim" has been blacklisted. She's not getting work, and work that had been scheduled has since been cancelled. She's actually wondering why no one in the industry wants to deal with her now. Porn does not have a scarcity mindset where whores are concerned. And tatted up fetish whores are a bit low on the totem pole because they're hard to jerk off to.
BTW, Leigh Raven the "victim"? She's selling her used panties to help pay the rent as well. The industry doesn't want to deal with her either.
And the idiots at Jezebel chimed in on the story as well. They claim they can't draw any conclusions but are inclined to believe what the whore is "feeling". They're also appalled at this kind of porn, and all the rest of the feminist crap you'd expect. But what has them most outraged? The director made transphobic and homophobic comments at some point.
The hamster is real.
Here's the first part of the story from last month. This link is probably NSFW.
http://mikesouth.com/porn-stars/consent-...ers-22183/
Here's the TL;DR version. A new site is shooting content to get started. They bring in a known and reliable stunt cock from vegas to LA to shoot a scene. The whore scheduled to shoot the scene flaked at the last minute. Stunt cock was on good terms with some other whores in LA and texts one to see if she wants to shoot a scene. The whore agrees. The scene is performed. Everyone leaves. A few days later, the whore has gone to the police accusing stunt cock and producer/director of abuse, assault, etc. Whore and her "wife" put up a video on youtube taking their allegations public. They go on twitter as well and a shitstorm ensues. All the usual stuff. Most everyone believes the whore. Detractors are shouted down, and stunt cock is unable to find work.
A week ago the truth was revealed. (I just heard about this tonight due to a super condensed version of the events being recently posted on efukt). As I said, the whore went to the police. So the police contacted the producer so they could talk to him. He went to the station with the full video of her from the moment she arrived, until the time she left. It was about 2 hours and 40 minutes. A few hours later, the producer left the police station. No further witnesses were questioned, and no charges have been filed.
Again, this link is probably NSFW.
http://mikesouth.com/industry/everything...deo-22427/
So what's the rest of the story?
Leigh Raven and Nikki Hearts are scissor sisters a same sex married couple who both get fucked on film to pay the rent. Leigh Raven is the one who shot the scene in question. The stunt cock knew both of them and had hung out with them on a prior trip to LA. Nikki Hearts even mentioned having a bit of a crush on the stunt cock (i think this is critical info). He calls Raven to shoot a scene when the original whore flaked. She enthusiastically agreed. I think this shit got started because Hearts was jealous that her "wife" got called to get fucked by a guy she was attracted to.
To make a long story short, everything they alleged happened was proven false in the full video. Hearts clearly appears to be behind this. In some ways, she's been more vocal than Raven. This quote sums up why this is relevant as many women likely harbor this view in the age of social media.
"Raven’s wife, Nikki Hearts, has led the charge against us on social media, and one of the most troubling aspects of this incident is that Ms. Hearts has expressed the view that the actual video evidence should be ignored in favor of her and Raven’s construction of the incident made after the fact."
Fuck black and white evidence, all that matters is my feelings.
Throughout the full video, the director, producer, and stunt cock display a much higher level of professionalism than one would ever expect on a porn set. They make it absolutely clear what will happen, the general them of the video, etc. They seek her consent on virtually every activity they will engage in, and they do so repeatedly. They tell her exactly how to let them know if she's uncomfortable in any way. There is never a moment of doubt as to whether or not she consents in all of this. She clearly does, and does it with enthusiasm.
Hearts ("victim's" "wife") says that Raven's cheerful demeanor was a survival technique to buy her time to get out of there. Which of course begs this question.
"Our response to this all-too convenient claim is to ask: if behaving as though one consents, having a positive, cheerful demeanor, and refusing to take a director up on his offer to call for a ”cut” in the action if a boundary is overstepped, constitutes behavior that is not to be trusted or believed, then how could anyone on the set have known that she was (allegedly) distraught or experiencing intolerable discomfort?"
And why have I started a thread about the porn industry? How is this relevant to us? The next quote explains it.
"And moreover, we ask: by the standard Hearts and Raven propose, what behavior would EVER constitute proof of “real” consent? What Hearts and Raven propound doesn’t merely attempt to rescind or invalidate consent, it un-defines consent as a concept. "
In essence, female logic suggests that consent is an abstract concept that women can define at their discretion. And fuck your reputation.
In the aftermath, I'm not sure if the director, producer, and stunt cock have been back to work. According to the article, despite the industry's initial support for the whores in question, Nikki Hearts, the jealous "wife" of the "victim" has been blacklisted. She's not getting work, and work that had been scheduled has since been cancelled. She's actually wondering why no one in the industry wants to deal with her now. Porn does not have a scarcity mindset where whores are concerned. And tatted up fetish whores are a bit low on the totem pole because they're hard to jerk off to.
BTW, Leigh Raven the "victim"? She's selling her used panties to help pay the rent as well. The industry doesn't want to deal with her either.
And the idiots at Jezebel chimed in on the story as well. They claim they can't draw any conclusions but are inclined to believe what the whore is "feeling". They're also appalled at this kind of porn, and all the rest of the feminist crap you'd expect. But what has them most outraged? The director made transphobic and homophobic comments at some point.
The hamster is real.