Science behind babies: The more sex you have the more likely you'll have a boy
12-10-2017, 02:15 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tress.html
Any truth to this?
"So more conceptions are likely to occur earlier in the fertile period and therefore give a higher chance of having a boy.
This theory is backed up by another peak for boys in the UK in 1973. While there was no war on, this is when the average age of women at marriage was at its lowest — 21 — and there was a surge of teenage pregnancies.
It was a time of intense sexual activity in the young. Clearly frantic fornication produces more boys....
While more boys are born at the end of wars, relatively more girls are born in times of prolonged parental stress — for example, as happened after the 1995 Japanese earthquake and in New York in the wake of the destruction of the Twin Towers in 2001.
Prolonged financial hardship also produces a similar trend. "
Any truth to this?
"So more conceptions are likely to occur earlier in the fertile period and therefore give a higher chance of having a boy.
This theory is backed up by another peak for boys in the UK in 1973. While there was no war on, this is when the average age of women at marriage was at its lowest — 21 — and there was a surge of teenage pregnancies.
It was a time of intense sexual activity in the young. Clearly frantic fornication produces more boys....
While more boys are born at the end of wars, relatively more girls are born in times of prolonged parental stress — for example, as happened after the 1995 Japanese earthquake and in New York in the wake of the destruction of the Twin Towers in 2001.
Prolonged financial hardship also produces a similar trend. "