The less people that can censor the internet the better.
Facebook, twitter, and google can keep doing whatever censorship they're doing now if net neutrality is repealed. The only change they'll have to deal with is to pay a bigger cut of money to ISPs.
In exchange for that you'd give the ISPs power to do the same kind of censorship, which they don't have now.
It's a tradeoff that only a sucker would take. You can say "oh ISP censorship is only hypothetical, oh you can't name an example blablabla..." the possibility is still there and if you'd subject yourself to it just to lower zuckerberg's bottom line a bit you're a sucker.
Facebook, twitter, and google can keep doing whatever censorship they're doing now if net neutrality is repealed. The only change they'll have to deal with is to pay a bigger cut of money to ISPs.
In exchange for that you'd give the ISPs power to do the same kind of censorship, which they don't have now.
It's a tradeoff that only a sucker would take. You can say "oh ISP censorship is only hypothetical, oh you can't name an example blablabla..." the possibility is still there and if you'd subject yourself to it just to lower zuckerberg's bottom line a bit you're a sucker.