[Off The Reservation]

How Broadway spreads Marxism and dangerous lies: a review of the musical Waitress.

No one ever trashes this play so I hope - complete with spoilers - to give it an ass kicking worse than has ever been done in writing before. I want to review this play to expose the specific techniques used by Broadway to spread SJWism, and hopefully identify the fraud so that it can be seen elsewhere in entertainment and media.

Waitress seems innocent enough. The professional reviews and promotional material would have you believe it is the story of a struggling working woman and how she rises above a verbally abusive husband and economic hardship. Let's take a closer look. The plot is going to give us all we need to know.

The story opens with the character Jenna (played by a truly mezmorizing actress, the beautiful Betsy Wolfe.)



She makes delicious pies of all varieties that are universally loved. She works in a resturant that serves her pies and coffee, and she is also loved as a server. The setting is a non-descript "Southern" town because for the first 15 minutes of the play the cast all do fake Southern accents before they forget they were supposed to. (I say this in jest, actually the play is very well acted and sung and this is part of the danger.)

At some point we meet Jenna husband, this rough and tumble - like to drink on Tuesdays working guy. The story intentionally paints him as abusive as he takes her tips every night, and gets a little loud with his wife. Back to him later, but you get the picture. The perfect baking hard working woman and the rough around the edges man.



Whenver you have a doubt about a piece look at the plot. I may be skipping a few things but Jenna is at work on day and they find out she is pregnant. Here is where the hamsterism of this story really starts to take hold. The play spends a great deal of time explaining that this was an accident that she the wife got drunk and accidentally let her husband fuck her, something that hasn't happened in a while. So despite there being a context of a marriage that she freely chose you the dear viewer has been convinced this is an "accident." This should tip you off that you are going to need sympathy for her later, if she should do something vicious you can remember that she is the victim of an accident.

Into the story walks the gynecologist. The lanky yet polished, highly educated but unable to speak to a pretty girl character is "smitten" by the girl and her pie. She does indeed give him free pie - both kinds. She seduces this married doctor and has an ongoing affair right on the exam table. (She is still the innocent little pie bater girl in the story however.) Here is the doc.



Moving along and skipping the less important parts of the story we get to the day of the birth of her daughter. Its a busy day for the new mother, she breaks off the affair and sends the new Father packing damning him to never see her or his daughter again. He had just found and taken a stash of cash in the sofa that she has hidden to go to a pie baking contest and broke his guitar in protest of her non disclosure. The audience literally roars to their feet at her dumping the moron. But it is the audience that are the morons who have fallen for this emotional trick and suddenly glorify the mother in her total dismissal of the father, without thinking of the consequences.

How will she live? Well that's easy, the owner of the pie shop gifts her the shop as a way of celebrating her decision to dump the dad. How convenient for her. This is the second provider to come along. Here at RVF we have heard the story of women who get pregnant form a loser and then look for providers to raise another mans baby... Nothing new. Dump the Dad and get free stuff. Now where would they get such an idea?

What does it mean and how is it Marxist propaganda? By painting the characters in the way they do a. the men are either assholes or cuck providers and b. women have zero responsibility and the main character who is a despicable and unthinkably bad woman is upheld as a hero. The play literally glorifies single motherhood and spreads a lie that this is a highly desirable thing. The daughter is literally lifted up as a God at the end of the play. She gets dick from a married successful man WHILE pregnant with her husbands child, and gets provided for by an old capitalist at no charge and having demonstrated no value to the world except that she can bake. The play doesn't come right out and say it but what they mean is that the means of production should be given to the women workers.

And all the while the lefttard actors and audience eat this up and dangerously go about hamstering for the god of single motherhood and the idea that men's capital should be given or stolen for women.

You could not ask for a more perfectly written, beautifully delivered, appeal to pure evil than that which is served up in Waitress.