Quote: (06-17-2017 12:17 PM)Mochihunter Wrote:
I think what's worse is the guys who are attracted and go after girls like this. These men are openly sponsoring degeneracy and ugliness.
Openly sponsoring this would be paying for her tattoos, her being the mother of your kids, or wifing her up.
Certain kinds of tats aren't bad looking on a girl.
We all have our types, of course I'd prefere a female without tattoos but I of course have my maxes (no hands, face, neck, chest piece, sternum, etc)
I'm not turning down an 8 with a fat ass and supple nips because she has some tattoo.
Whatever the hamster will soothe them.
Tattoos are mainstream - it's ever increasing, especially more so here in Southern California over the last decade.
This is regardless if men approve of them or not, they're doing it "for themselves".