Can't find the clip now, but saw this afternoon the last few minutes from Nye's show. It featured four mannequins with lights and image projected onto them as he rattled off a bunch of BS assertions on sex and gender.
He concluded with the sage observation to the effect of "for all of us, gender, sexual identity, and sexual attraction are on a spectrum." Which of course, you just know he doesn't believe about himself - it would be fun to see someone actually press him on that.
No sooner does he make this assertion than he backtracks where he himself is concerned, leading off with: "Of course, as a cis-male" and following it up by slyly casting himself like a zoologist impartially observing the mating habits of some other species with nothing in common with his own. It's as though he wanted everyone else to believe the narrative he was peddling, but did not want anyone to think those universal "scientific" pronouncements he was making actually applied to himself. No siree, don't let that scrawny frame and squirrely bowtie fool you, mister, he's as straight as an arrow, no spectrum for him, 100% het, you bet.
"Bill Nye the 'No-Homo' Guy."
As for the Mythbusters dude...he like Nye is a great illustration of how utterly phony this narrative is. Five years ago they would both have said (and did say, in Nye's case) things 180 degrees opposed to what they're now saying, and would have been enraged at the idea that we should subordinate actual science to childish feelings and sexual perversities and weaponized envy. Their contrary-to-interests embrace of SJWism in general and "gender theory" in particular, so hard and so suddenly, and the matter-of-factness of how they present their opinions on the matter (as if they'd held those same opinions forever, and that no sensible person could think otherwise) shows that what they're pushing is neither science nor sincere.
He concluded with the sage observation to the effect of "for all of us, gender, sexual identity, and sexual attraction are on a spectrum." Which of course, you just know he doesn't believe about himself - it would be fun to see someone actually press him on that.
No sooner does he make this assertion than he backtracks where he himself is concerned, leading off with: "Of course, as a cis-male" and following it up by slyly casting himself like a zoologist impartially observing the mating habits of some other species with nothing in common with his own. It's as though he wanted everyone else to believe the narrative he was peddling, but did not want anyone to think those universal "scientific" pronouncements he was making actually applied to himself. No siree, don't let that scrawny frame and squirrely bowtie fool you, mister, he's as straight as an arrow, no spectrum for him, 100% het, you bet.
"Bill Nye the 'No-Homo' Guy."
As for the Mythbusters dude...he like Nye is a great illustration of how utterly phony this narrative is. Five years ago they would both have said (and did say, in Nye's case) things 180 degrees opposed to what they're now saying, and would have been enraged at the idea that we should subordinate actual science to childish feelings and sexual perversities and weaponized envy. Their contrary-to-interests embrace of SJWism in general and "gender theory" in particular, so hard and so suddenly, and the matter-of-factness of how they present their opinions on the matter (as if they'd held those same opinions forever, and that no sensible person could think otherwise) shows that what they're pushing is neither science nor sincere.