[Thomas the Rhymer]

(04-04-2017 05:03 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 04:35 AM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

I saw this story on another news website today as well...

Anyway, it inspired me with a new heuristic:

How good a product is, is inversely proportional to how much sex is required to sell it.

In other words, these clothes must really suck if they have to use pornography to sell it.

Good products don't need sex to sell them. (Even condoms. The best, most reliable condom brands have plain non-descript packaging, at least where I'm from. It's the thin burstable condoms that have pics of busty buxom babes on the box.)

Soooooooo this:



Is worthless?

Would you care about that underwear if a fat bearded chick was wearing it?