#LactateGate: Toronto Leah McLaren Enter a Baby’s room to “Breastfeed" Topless
03-28-2017, 12:45 AM
Some weird ass shit in that article.
It sounds creepy as hell, like the former author was a participant in a child porn forum.
Let's get to the basic of the story: This bitch claimed that she was drunk at a house party & she entered the homeowners’ bedroom to find a baby boy who “consented” to her attempting to strip naked for her to “breastfeed”.
She wanted to “breastfeed” him by stripping her vetements off so that the infant boy can suck her non-lactating breast while she was partially naked. This wasn't her child, but the son of a now-"Conservative" MP running for Presidency in Canada.
She hamsters her actions by comparing the Slavery colonial period when thick Black mothers were forced to breastfeed the same-sex infants of their white, or (((white))) Colonial masters during Slavery.
That’s more fucking infuriating because this white harpie doesn’t know about the suffering of black women in slavery. Those black women weren’t excited to “breastfeed” the daughters of (((white))) slave owner.
This Toronto harpie became popular all the way down to Cape Coral, FL. I’m not kidding. Lots of people think this woman is a potential baby molester or pedophile, but it can only be alleged, because that could end up like Alex Jones and that James Alfanatis shit.
It can be probable that this woman is one of the masterminds in the Toronto-Canada mainstream media behind the Roosh pro-rape libel in 2015, but read the wording of the remnants of Leah’s article (Globe & Mail claimed that they 404’d the original article for “Legal Reasons” of course)…
It sounds like she is writing child erotica like she wanted to fuck that baby or something like that.
Creepy, stuff. It’s like similar stuff that what convicted pedophile, Ben Levin wrote online which caused him to go in jail after confiding his fantasies with an undercover female cop, except that Leah uses “breastfeeding” as a toned down way to conceal sexual innuendo with minors, without further pushing the envelope by avoiding sexual assault charged themes like found in Ben Levin.
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2017/03/27...30742.html
All the way down to Cape Coral, FL this article became viral.
What infuriated me was that it was the Canadian establishment media who first started to defame Roosh back in 2015 for writing a satire piece which could have been published by an editor found in your local college dorm during Abercrombie days in the early 2000.
This Leah Clarence looked like she wanted to write child erotica under the disguise of “breastfeeding”. What sickening stuff.
It’s one thing for Toronto media to falsely accuse Roosh of sexual assault for writing a satire college humor piece, but it’s another thing for the Globe & Mail to assent and post written child erotica under the disguise of breastfeeding an infant without their or their parent consent.
It sounds creepy as hell, like the former author was a participant in a child porn forum.
Let's get to the basic of the story: This bitch claimed that she was drunk at a house party & she entered the homeowners’ bedroom to find a baby boy who “consented” to her attempting to strip naked for her to “breastfeed”.
She wanted to “breastfeed” him by stripping her vetements off so that the infant boy can suck her non-lactating breast while she was partially naked. This wasn't her child, but the son of a now-"Conservative" MP running for Presidency in Canada.
She hamsters her actions by comparing the Slavery colonial period when thick Black mothers were forced to breastfeed the same-sex infants of their white, or (((white))) Colonial masters during Slavery.
That’s more fucking infuriating because this white harpie doesn’t know about the suffering of black women in slavery. Those black women weren’t excited to “breastfeed” the daughters of (((white))) slave owner.
This Toronto harpie became popular all the way down to Cape Coral, FL. I’m not kidding. Lots of people think this woman is a potential baby molester or pedophile, but it can only be alleged, because that could end up like Alex Jones and that James Alfanatis shit.
It can be probable that this woman is one of the masterminds in the Toronto-Canada mainstream media behind the Roosh pro-rape libel in 2015, but read the wording of the remnants of Leah’s article (Globe & Mail claimed that they 404’d the original article for “Legal Reasons” of course)…
It sounds like she is writing child erotica like she wanted to fuck that baby or something like that.
Creepy, stuff. It’s like similar stuff that what convicted pedophile, Ben Levin wrote online which caused him to go in jail after confiding his fantasies with an undercover female cop, except that Leah uses “breastfeeding” as a toned down way to conceal sexual innuendo with minors, without further pushing the envelope by avoiding sexual assault charged themes like found in Ben Levin.
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2017/03/27...30742.html
Quote:Quote:
Leah McLaren Column About Trying To Breastfeed A Stranger's Baby Without Permission Breaks Twitter
The Huffington Post Canada | By Andree Lau
Posted: 03/27/2017 12:48 am EDT Updated: 03/27/2017 12:05 pm EDT
Share
Tweet
Comment
AdChoices
Globe and Mail columnist and author Leah McLaren has made a career out of sharing her life as part of her work. But her latest column has pretty much broken Twitter.
In "The joy (and politics) of breastfeeding someone else’s baby," McLaren reminisces about that time she tried to breastfeed now-Conservative leadership candidate Michael Chong's infant more than a decade ago.
She writes that she was at a Toronto house party when she was about 25, and walked into a bedroom where there was a baby in a car seat. Already feeling "broody" and "glum," McLaren says she picked up the infant to "give him a cuddle."
The columnist was then seized by the urge to try breastfeeding him — even though she was not lactating or pregnant.
"But would it be so bad, I wondered, if I just tried it out — just for a minute — just to see what it felt like?" McLaren wrote.
A Globe columnist said she began removing her blouse, planned to breastfeed Michael Chong's baby... without consent. https://t.co/MBZU40tv2C
— Sean Craig (@sdbcraig) March 26, 2017
She says she unbuttoned her blouse and was just about to reach into her bra, when a man she identified as Chong walked in and retrieved his son. Chong is an Ontario MP and currently running for the Tory party leadership.
The column, which was published this week, has been removed from the Globe website. But a cached version is still available online.
Uhh, did anyone grab a copy of this column before it was 404'd? pic.twitter.com/gRx6rAb0F7
— ishmael n. daro (@iD4RO) March 26, 2017
On Sunday night, Twitter users didn't know what to react to first. First, there was the mystery.
So @goldsbie has done the math and when @leahmclaren was 25 @MichaelChongMP had no babies so WHOSE BABY DID SHE TRY TO FORCE HER BOOB ON?
— Jesse Brown (@JesseBrown) March 27, 2017
UPDATE: Michael Chong released a statement on Monday and told The Huffington Post Canada in an email: "This incident happened over 10 years ago. It was odd, no doubt, but not of any real consequence. I entered this race to discuss important challenges facing Canada. I am happy to discuss those. But I won't be making any further comment on this."
There was outrage.
@sdbcraig @leahmclaren 'weird' doesn't begin to describe this. Not only is this behaviour inappropriate; it verges on some sort of assault
— Sebastian DeGrandis (@SebMarkinTO) March 27, 2017
if this happened to my baby and i seen it, I would call the police on the drunk pedophile|https://t.co/31QBkIlpnz#cdnpoli #leahmclaren
— ISHBAHFF (@AntiTiSA) March 27, 2017
There was plain WTF.
Me: Why do I keep seeing Leah Mclaren in my timeline?
*finds and reads article*
Me: pic.twitter.com/pNxB5zbtGC
— Jill (@jedichica) March 27, 2017
@JesseBrown @leahmclaren @sdbcraig I don't... I mean... Why did they publish this? And why did she write this? Also put ur boob away lady!!
— Bad Critic (@Eliisabadcritic) March 27, 2017
And there was regular funny stuff.
Went to washroom at bar last night. Asked #LeahMcLaren to watch my vodka, came back to a White Russian. Not cool. https://t.co/9N32t4WAl7
— Mark Critch (@markcritch) March 27, 2017
Find yourself someone who looks at you the way Leah McLaren looks at a hungry baby.
— ? or barbarism (@grahamvsworld) March 27, 2017
McLaren's column concludes with her touting the benefits of co-feeding — which she said she experienced after having her own babies — and wondering why wet nurses aren't more popular.
@JesseBrown @leahmclaren it is the weirdest argument for ending stigma around co-feeding I've read. And will have the opposite effect. ?
— ???? ????? (@happystash) March 27, 2017
@ArielTroster @JulieSLalonde Judging from that column, I think Leah McLaren has zero clue what wet nurses do, much less the racist history
— Voltron of Failure (@mattrose) March 27, 2017
McLaren, who is Maclean's magazine's London correspondent, is no stranger to controversy.
In 2012, the Globe's Public Editor Sylvia Stead found it was a conflict of interest for McLaren to promote (and then sell) her own home in the newspaper's Home of the Week feature.
All the way down to Cape Coral, FL this article became viral.
What infuriated me was that it was the Canadian establishment media who first started to defame Roosh back in 2015 for writing a satire piece which could have been published by an editor found in your local college dorm during Abercrombie days in the early 2000.
This Leah Clarence looked like she wanted to write child erotica under the disguise of “breastfeeding”. What sickening stuff.
It’s one thing for Toronto media to falsely accuse Roosh of sexual assault for writing a satire college humor piece, but it’s another thing for the Globe & Mail to assent and post written child erotica under the disguise of breastfeeding an infant without their or their parent consent.