[storm]

What a ridiculous spin.

Here is the article:
http://sex.sagepub.com/content/early/201...38094.refs

Quote:

The majority of respondents (58%) said that they would see different sex workers. Only 5% said that they would always see the same sex worker. However, nearly one-third of respondents said that they tried to see the same one, but would see others if this were not possible.

Only one in twenty sees the same ho. Article is trash. The number is hard capped at 1/3 because 2/3 prefer novelty over whatever passes for a relationship here and the rest express only some vague preferences: "a small number of favourites[sic]".

The article? It's drivel but there are some useful statistics. The methodology seems standard for this sort of sociology.

Interesting quotes:

Quote:

The vast majority of clients in our sample pay for the services of female sex workers
(85%).

One in seven whoremongers is a homosexual.

Only one in four are incels:


About 1/15 expect to stop paying for sex if it were outlawed:

Quote:

Respondents were also asked what they would do if it were to be made illegal to pay for sexual services. The results suggest that criminalizing paying for sex would be a very ineffective policy measure. Only 7% of survey respondents said they would stop paying for sex altogether if it was illegal whilst 15% would simply pay for sex elsewhere. The most likely responses given by clients were that they would only see sex workers that they trusted (42%) or simply would be more careful (38%). Meanwhile, 13% of respondents said they would not do anything
differently.

Quote:

Some clients explicitly stated that they did not feel the need to be in a conventional relationship and preferred encounters with sex workers because there were (usually) no emotional strings attached. In our survey, 38% of respondents offered this as one of their reasons to pay for sex – one of the most common responses.

Some are forced into this because they have no game and are aware that marriage is a loser's bargain. For the guys who were divorced and got the story out there, thank you:

Quote:

During the interview, it became apparent that Nick was generally sceptical about the social institution of marriage:
To be honest: if I’m in a relationship, if I got married, all of a sudden she controls the purse strings, because if anything ever happens – through my fault or her fault, or through nobody’s fault, the marriage is up, I pay a price for that, a financial price, for that for the rest of my life . . . So for me, escorts provide that compartmentalized situation where I can enjoy curious sex or I can experiment, non-judgmentally, and it’s compartmentalized. And, you know, that’s kind of why the core reason of why I do it.