Quote: (09-28-2015 02:12 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:
Agreed.
Venus Demilo is pretty much a 10 in the definition of 'thick women' with those hips but is definitely not fat...I've got to remember this one for when chicks claim to be 'thick'
![[Image: venusdemilo.jpg]](http://www.onlineartcenter.com/images/venusdemilo.jpg)
Hmmmmm. This is interesting.
Somehow Venus' measurements have changed from the early 20th century to the early 21st.
A 1916 New York (before it was Beta) Times article listed her as a height of 5'4" (which would have been tall for a girl in ancient Greece) and measurements of 37-26-38, https://www.quora.com/Art-History/What-a...us-de-Milo
However, a host of more recent articles insist she is 34-31.5-40. Was the older article wrong or are the more recent articles doing the same kind of size inflation that modern women's clothes makers have been caught doing recently (i.e. to keep our modern female population from getting bad feels about their continued fattening)?
Even if the latter measurements are correct, WB Venus even without her arms. Sorry ladies, most of you are not "thick" like Venus. You're thick like Lena.