[AnonymousBosch]

Last year - possibly buried in the epic Elliot Rodger thread sometime in May - I mentioned an increasing observation of Millennial Women growing awkward and uncomfortable about sex, despite guys saying sloots still seemed to be everywhere. I was talking about the current culture being shaped for sex-negative attitudes to become the mainstream: particularly-asexuality and female incels.

I did find myself referring back to the original post in this post from July last year though:

Quote:

All the cultural signs seem to be pointing towards an oncoming shift by women into Neo-Victorian sexual prudery. I expect it to be one of the main theological splinters of feminism in the next few years - the pro-sex versus the anti-sex.

Smoke 'em while you got 'em.

This was the coming split I saw coming that would clearly-define what I've kept calling Fourth Wave Feminism, the differences I identified between them here:

Quote:

Sex-positive vs sex-negative.
Community vs segregation.
Optimism vs suspicion.
Earnest vs abusive.
Physical vs online.
Collectivism vs authoritarianism.
Pacifism vs fantasies of violence.
Self-love vs self-loathing.
Libertine vs puritan.
Creating art vs curating art.
Changing the world vs controlling the world.

I've also spoken of sensing an increasing need for women to be getting their incessant need for drama in their relationships with men fulfilled by online drama / social activism. Rather than flying into a fury over their man, and thrilling in their unchecked emotions - what all women crave above all else - they're flying into fury over all men.

Returning to Australia after a couple of months away, I've noticed the shifts I was predicting. Things are happening very quickly:

---

Four recent observations:

Prostitution

There's an increasing rise in the number of articles and petitions calling for ending prostitution: a process that specifically states the decriminalising of the women involved so they can be subjected to 'holistic healing' whilst making it illegal to purchase sexual services.

Yes, even a Fleshlight is problematic, because it turns a vagina into an 'object to be used and discarded'.

As such, Feminism is now splitting between the third and fourth wavers:

Third wavers see Fourth Wavers as 'SWERFs' - (sex worker exclusive radical feminsts).

Fourth Wavers are now calling Third Wavers 'Liberal Feminists', pronouncing 'Liberal' with the same sort of disgust Traditional Right Winger would have 30 years ago.

---

Banning Adult Sites



Horse-Faced, Blotchy-Skinned Radfem Typist Crows about it in this article, offering nothing the standard Illusory-Superiority Snark I'd expect from Women who major in the Humanities, (average IQ of graduates 112 or less - as per the National Centre for Education Statistics - and since 109 is the cut-off for 'average intelligence' it's bizarre they're always consulted as experts by the media in stories involving social policies and human behaviour).

Melbourne's Ormond College takes bold position against porn, students turn to liberal feminism

Excerpt version with condescending snark removed, bar my highlight for emphasis.

Quote:

In what might be deemed a radical move, The University of Melbourne's largest residential college banned access to pornography on campus. This means students at Ormond College will be blocked from accessing "adult sites" on Wi-Fi networks.

The reason for this is straightforward. As college master Dr. Rufus Black stated, pornography is exploitative and "presents women primarily as sex objects who are a means to the end of male pleasure."

... unfunny snark cut ...

While Black told Jill Stark at The Age that "allowing the college's 400 students to access porn on its network would be condoning the objectification of women," some students felt the ban limited "freedom of expression."

... unfunny snark cut ...

But, in truth, it isn't "sexual expression" that's being banned (if that's the line of argument we're going with), it's just men's "right" to access websites that sell female degradation. So "expression" is not limited in the least. No one has banned masturbation and, of course, men are still free to think about

... unfunny snark cut ...

Luckily, male students angered by the ban have liberal feminism to fall back on, so they don't need to defend their misogynist interests as such.

Here's the schism forming: fourth wave feminism is calling third-wave, sex-positive feminists who believe pornography empowers women misogynistic. As always, Leftists eventually eat each other alive.



From another article:

Quote:

A majority of comments across social media also agree with the dorm's stance on porn access.

Which is not what I saw - most were far more references to 'Nanny States' - but there's a narrative to sell.

"Finally Ormond College is taking a stand against the objectification and exploitation of women. Good move, set the bar high I say," Facebook poster Louise Angwin said.

Louise's Facebook picture has a) angelic glow backlighting; b) high-grain texture; and c) selective cropping of both body AND face, and so, based upon the forum's oft-stated theories of Female Photography, you can accurately-guess that she's far less attractive than the porn stars she's bitter about not being able to compete with.

---

Lad Mag Goes Under

Feminists recently ran a campaign to force supermarkets to stop selling Lad Mag Zoo Weekly, succeeding with one of the major retailers. A couple of weeks later, the magazine has announced it's going under.

Whilst the Industry Whispers and Feminists Organisers would seem to suggest it was the hysterical campaign that struck the fatal blow, this article is interesting in both trying to paint its failure as The Inevitable March of Progress, (with The Right Side Of History Marxist implications), and the sex-negative furious invective on display.

RIP Zoo Weekly — a vile, repugnant and tasteless publication

I'd suggest reading the whole thing, so you can clearly-understand the similarity to the traditional Moral Crusaders of the past - what we Australian's have called since the 1900's 'Wowsers'.

Whilst this is the little Gay-or-Low-T? Hipster who wrote it:



...note the body language with the shoulders and legs...



His article-cum tantrum, which I'm sure he's congratulating-himself furiously for is hilarious, because it's interchangeable with the anti-pornography rants of the old white bigots of 30 years ago, such as Fred Nile and Bruce Ruxton, yet is apparently 'progress' of some sort.







The famous quote by Orwell on Leftists:

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”


Unfortunately, he's the Editor for an Arts Magazine in Melbourne, and, as a Creative myself, he's part of the plague of Fourth Wave Millennial Journalists who believe it is their place to Curate Art, (since they fear Creating it), with particular focus on what can and can't be said. Fuck that.

I'll side with Normal Lindsay here, and call the Typist the Wowser he is.



---

Sexually-Awkward

Australian Feminists in the media have also been doing multiple thinkpieces on Michelle Goldberg's article in the Nation, celebrating the message that Liberated Feminists (Third Wavers) are oppressing Dominance Feminists (Fourth Wavers, believes Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon's theories that all sex is about male control over women) by labelling them SWERF's.

The Problem With Idolizing Sexual Liberation

Note this:

Quote:

“The compulsion to appear ‘liberated’ [by other feminists] is a form of regulation of its own.”

As such, they're all coming clean with what I predicted last year, that Millennials Girls are increasingly-finding sex makes them feel 'judged' and 'awkward'.

Unfortunately, I can't find my original post on the subject, but somewhere a while back I discussed the rising trend for affecting made-up sexual identifications, each more increasingly-narrow and ridiculous than the last. My belief was it is a way of both avoiding sex and rationalising sexual-unattractiveness to others, since your sexuality is now so specific that it's almost impossible to find someone compatible.

From the article, my emphasis:

Quote:

...a 23-year-old Seattle woman named Cara who is mortified by her barely existent sex life. She’s had sex on two occasions: a one-night stand and a threesome. But she is intensely self-conscious and finds the thought of being seen naked “cringe-inducing.” At one point, she decides that perhaps she is asexual, an idea she found “pretty empowering.” “This is my special classification, and it seemed like that’s something that would be more respected than just saying, ‘I don’t want to have sex with you.’”

The thinkpiece responses to this article are telling in themselves, but so are the comments from women. Basically: I'm relieved I'm not the only who is uncomfortable with sex.

The text from a sex-negative picture that is currently-doing the rounds:

Quote:

Don’t be fooled. A new study claims to prove that people who watch porn are more likely to be feminists. All it really proves is that our modern definition of feminism really appeals to porn-sick men. (You can guess why).

I wrote in July last year how the rise in makeup shaming struck me as part of this coming wave.

Quote:

Advocating sexual modesty and plain presentation + 'love me for my qualities other than beauty' = pioneer women (without the homemaking skills).

It's all leading to a Wave of Puritanism where heterosexual sex is A Bad Thing, hence the need to redefine as 'rape' any feeling of sexual violation - even being stared at. If you're looking to the link for why Fourth Wave Feminism defends Islam: I believe this is the answer. Wearing a hijab would actually make them feel less awkward and sexually-objectified.

---

The fascinating part of this, is though I've been predicting it, the truth is being revealed far more quickly and the signs are accelerating. These events have all happened in the last few days, (much like how Roosh has observed how quickly the media narrative is crumbling). There's a wave of sexual repression and censorship looming over Australia, and it'll be interesting to see what happens.

I suspect within two years Sexually-Empowered Pop Sluts will be passé: I'd mentioned a while ago that Lorde struck me as the first sign that a grunge-style sea change away from the values of Modern Pop's Conspicuous Consumption and Sexual Hedonism might be happening.