Quote: (06-30-2017 08:46 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
The main reason which should be logical for everyone is that no - China did not build itself up on it's own. You simply don't transfer 80% of your manufacturing capacity and technology as a globalist if you do not control a country.
Capitalists built factories in China because it's profitable to do so. Nothing more. China is simply the most profitable place to build your factories and that's it.
And no, it's Japan and South Korea that got real technological transfer from the US, not China. The US set experts to Japan to teach them technology. The same thing was not given to China. China moved up the technological ladder by:
a. Allowing foreign enterprises to open factories on their land and learn the modus operandi by observing.
b. Hacking the fuck out of more technological advanced countries. If they were backed by globalist elites they wouldn’t need to do this.
c. Pressuring foreign enterprises into transfering technology in order to have access to the Chinese market, as they’re doing now.
Aside from traditional methods like investing in education, R&D, abroad study, etc. That’s it.
Quote:Quote:
They destroyed the old culture first, foisted the communists to power and then they shifted back again to a pseudo-capitalist system.
No, the CPC has complete power previous to the Cultural Revolution.
Quote:Quote:
You have a myriad of examples from China - the Strong family - https://usefulstooges.com/2015/12/25/ann...er-for-mao
Sounds like some dumb liberal to me.
Quote:Quote:
but also the Rockefellers have set up shop there a while ago.
Yeah, a business organization setting up shop in the most populous country. What about it?
Quote:Quote:
The guys studying the globalists plans knew about the ascent of China back in the 1970s. Actually they drew up long-term plans before in the 1930s after assessing the mentality of the people.
Napoleon saw China’s rise, too. Anyone would if they study China’s history and basic geographic and demographic conditions. A populous intelligent people will rise sooner or later.
Quote:Quote:
They knew that the Chines were hard-working and intelligent - also very obedient.
Yes and no.The Chinese’s loyalty is above all to their family and clan. Everything else is secondary. They will obey order in a power structure because that how they best survive and move up. Almost every Chinese wants to move up the ladder and no one wants to stay a lackey, if they can. Nobody is obedient for the sake of it (other than to their parents). They just want the money and the status. See my sig. Do they seem like some docile, virtuously obedient type? Heck no. To quote Suits, the Chinese live only to win in life.
China is arguably the most rebellious country in history. Throughout their long history they had countless rebellions. When the emperor is weal the vassals will eat up all the power. When the status quo become uncomfortable for the people while the emperor is weak then he gets overthrown. Confucian morality is really mostly a socio-political tool. The officials use it as a medium of legitimacy to attack each other and constraint each other and advance political goals. The people follow its precepts to attain prestige, and as a way to advance in life (through the imperial exams).
Which is why the Chinese will never bow down to some Jewish masters. They all want to be the boss. They prefer an authoritarian system because in an authoritarian system they will be more powerful when they get to climb the ladder. Mao himself is the typical power-hungry type.
The Han Chinese are also racial supremacist. Nothing is more ridiculous to them than the thought that they are inferior to some other race and should make money for those masters - unless forced to do so with guns pointing at their head. The Manchus had to kill millions of Han Chinese just for them to accept the braid hair, other essential Han culture remain intact.
Quote:Quote:
They only had to destroy the previous culture and subjugate them to communism.
Arguably nothing essential about Chinese culture was destroyed during the Cultural revolution. Some superficial temples and artifacts were destroyed. But they are rebuilding the temples now (what’s the point of destroying them and then rebuilding them if this is all planned? They regret it now because the old sites would have make tremendous money as tourist sites). Some etiquettes were destroyed, but some of them are being brought back like coming-of-age ceremonies. Some customs are gone for good, like feet-binding. Some relationship were damaged, but insignificant in the long term – not anything that can’t be ruined by desperate poverty and competitve market. China is currently more social conservative Japan which didn’t go through any cultural revolution. While the Japanese tout their architecture and tea ceremony and etiquettes and traditional foods and clothings, their women still fuck before marriage and their birth rate are low as fuck. The cultural traditionality is little more than empty shell when the birth rate is so low.
The most essential traditions which can be preserved in an industrialized society are still kept. The greatest medium of Chinese culture, the Hanzi, remains intact. Confucian classics and traditional religion are promoted. Classical Chinese are taught as compulsory subjects in school, and any good Chinese students can read text dating back thousand of years. They are rebuilding and strengthening their traditional culture. What’s the point of doing that if cultural revolution was part of the plan?
Even in the old day, the Chinese only pray to the Buddha and heaven of whatever deity there is for a prosperous life, or when they want a child. They were always a dominantly secular people, never deeply religious, and more clan/family-oriented than community-oriented. Their religious faith if there is any is superficial at best - of otherworldly matter they believe everything and trust nothing, and mostly indifferent. It was never important to whether Catholicism is true or Protestantism is true, and never will.
The Chinese are as cunning, greedy, and ruthless, as down-to-earth, pragmatic and worldly as they ever were. Apart from outward expressions like clothing and etiquette and architecture, they are just like their ancestors in inward spirit and personality. People are rude now because they were of peasant origin. A few generations later and they will adopt manner, and their cunning will be less crude and more sophisticated, but still cunning like their ancestors were.
Nobody in China believes in communism (except a few nuts). Especially the CPC members themselves. CPC membership is means of gaining power and advantage in life. Within the party Marx is frequently criticized and extensively scrutinized to find faults. The Chinese are never as distant from communism as they are now.