[Simeon_Strangelight]

Funny propaganda financed by a Soros organisation (funded with 500 mio. $) - blasted paid pro-rapefugee ad all across youtube:

Note the comments - they are deleting them and resetting the like to dislike ratio, but still losing.

--------------

In that context what will happen:

http://gatesofvienna.net/2007/04/is-euro...-part-two/

It is amazing that Paul Weston wrote this in 2007:

Quote:

Islamic terrorist activity is being constantly thwarted by European intelligence services, but over the next ten years some of these Jihadists will slip through the net and carry out their next very large atrocity. Although most Europeans are still in a deep liberal sleep regarding Islam, this will not last. By 2017 the tensions between Europeans and Islam will have become nerve jangling. Impotent officials will employ ever-stricter government controls in a futile attempt to preserve the façade of societal order.

Quote:

Somewhere between 2017 and 2030, during a period of heightened tension, Islamists in France, Holland or Britain will blow up one church, train or plane too many. Retaliation will begin and they, in turn will respond. So will the spiral begin.

That hasn't happened yet. Aside from Breivik there was recently just one retaliatory attack by this one Welshman.

Also Muslims have obviously not slaughtered enough people in a gruesome enough way for the public to get truly upset.

Quote:

The police are unable to cope now; they will be even less prepared then. The army will be drafted in, and members of the military who are even willing to carry out orders against their neighbours will find themselves massively outnumbered and outflanked. Civilians will be massacred. And so begins the civil war.

We have already the military patrolling some Western cities.

Options of Islam and the West:

Quote:

The first is that Islam integrates within Europe’s liberal democracies and we all live happily ever after This scenario takes no account of the moral sewer that Liberal policies have turned Europe into; a Europe which Islam, quite understandably, views with revulsion. Nor does it take into account that Islam today is the same as Islam in the 7th century. Why should they reform now? Given the increasing radicalisation of Muslim youth and the disturbing numbers whoagree with terrorist activity, this scenario is only possible within the mindset of deluded, ignorant liberals, whose naiveté is suicidal in the extreme. Option one can therefore be discounted.

The second option is that Islam quietly takes over demographically through sheer weight of numbers, and Europe is islamised under Sharia law. Bernard Lewis and Mark Steyn think this inevitable, Steyn being of the opinion that any country capable of the type of appeasement prevalent in Europe today, is also a country incapable of rousing a defence. Although this is a possibility, it is unlikely we will not fight back, so option two can also be discounted.

The third option is that Europe wakes up to the danger it is in and expels all its Muslims. This is not going to happen; the European Union positively embraces Islam, as noted in Bat Ye’or book Eurabia (thankfully abridged by Fjordman). Not only does the EU have no intention of such an action, they will not even stop further Islamic immigration. The 2.2 million predominately Muslim immigrants they wish to bring into Europe each and every year up to 2050 is a done deal as far as they are concerned.

Indeed, in an extract from this disturbing report published by the European Policy Centre, the EU seeks immigration not only for economic reasons but also for social reasons:

“However, the arguments against immigration remain dominant in the political debates of many European countries, and must be taken seriously and challenged if immigration is to keep its place on the social and economic agenda.”

Whilst this attitude prevails we can discount option three.

The fourth option is that moderate Muslims reclaim their peaceful religion from the “fundamentalists”, who, as we are told over and over again by our media, are not representative of Islam. But where exactly are these moderate Muslims, what power do they wield within Islam as a whole? When have we seen marches and protests organised by them, waving banners reading “Not in my name” or “Not in the name of Islam?” They are as cowed by the radicals as are our politicians, or perhaps they are in agreement with them, but are squeamish when it comes to spilling blood. The only face of Islam we see or hear in the West is that of the violent Jihadist. As such, option four can be discounted.

The fifth option is that we resist the Islamic take over, and fight back. I disagree with Lewis and Steyn, who both appear to think Europe will roll over and submit. The wholesale and unprecedented racial and cultural transformation of a continent with a history of violent warfare will simply not happen without confrontation.

There is only the 5th option. I don't think that Europe will roll over and become a Caliphate. All the generals, all the military leadership in Europe, the entire Eastern Europe, half of Western European locals by then - they would all rebel. There are millions of men who would rather die than submit to Islam. The majority of cops and soldiers are utterly anti-Islam. Also we should not forget that if Europe submits to Islam and becomes a Caliphate, then Israel is doomed and a "final solution" for all Jews is right around the corner. So submission as Houellebecq predicts is not realistic. Muslims would behave incredibly violent long before a political takeover is possible.

Weston may be a bit wrong about the exact timeline, but he was right so far.

I think that I have to move my plans further along. Civil war may start around 2025-2030, global Caliphate wars will start a bit later. I think that it is possible for Russia to succumb to Islam in a big coup as the majority of soldiers there will be Muslim in 2030. When Russia aids the Caliphate in Europe, then the conflict has officially become an obliterating world war.

Entire Middle East, Turkey, Bosnia, Albania, Caliphate of Swedistan, Russia, Indonesia, Thai-Caliphate islands, Caliphate islands Philippines, Muslim African states, Pakistan

vs.

USA, China, Eastern Europe, NATO Western Europe that was not captured by the Caliphate, Australia, New Zealand, Japan (will re-militarize)

It is likely that South America will stay out of the conflict. The biggest threat is only Russia and they will also likely be mired in a civil war, because no way will the local Russians submit to the neo-Caliphate there.

2025-2040: Beginning of ever greater civil war, escalation of conflict
2040-2050: Full on global war with Islam
2055: One world government, Islam banned or put on secular-mode

Would there be a way to prevent all this bloodshed?

Yes:

I agree with him, but it won't happen.

But I guess it is always helpful to already get the predictive programming pics out there for the serfs to get used to the urban warfare ahead of time:




I think I need to take a break from all of this and work harder on essentials.