Quote: (08-29-2015 07:04 PM)Suits Wrote:
I honestly think that this is a no-win situation. If you're footing the bill for bottle service when the girl has provided you with no sexual favours, you've already lost frame and she is going to categorize you as a better-beta provider.
@Suits.
I wasn't gonna touch this post, but it sounds like you've had a change of heart. Or maybe i'm just missing something.
I was preparing a post called Hidden Jewels, which was collected gems on RVF from posters who I don't think get enough props and attention.
Doing my research last week, I ran across a bunch of insightful posts.
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-28153-...#pid536989
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-26900-...#pid810407
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-41040-...#pid866289
In each of these situations, the idea is to invite chicks out that a player hasn't banged, supply them with food, libation, entertainment and accommodation, and leverage that status into banging them LATER.
With respect to supplying the goods without getting anything in return, The only difference between what was suggested and what he's doing is, is that he's doing it at a public place.
Is it really just a question of dollars? He's doing it @ 600% mark up? He can't control the environment as much?
In terms of what they think of him,
If he has that kind of paper already, to pop bottles for a three + broads, they might already put him into the provider category without him spending a dime.
That fact that he describes the spending as non-trivial is more of a tell, than sponsoring some bottle rats imo.
Bigger than the appetizers debate, the underlying question is
- does her opinion of you matter
- can you change her opinion
And that's when we really get into the realm of game.
What actually makes a woman attracted to you.
WIA