Irrespective of Diana Davison's "shots" at Roosh, which were weak at best; the crux of her argument is that by simply paying attention to women he "values women more than they deserve" and "puts women on a pedestal".
She feels that this is wrong. Instead, she feels men should be completely MGTOW, and "get a sense of self worth and validation without the approval of women". She goes on to say that men should "completely shut women out of [their] life".
In actual fact, the central thesis to her diatribe is the philosophical battle between MGTOW and Neomasculinity.
With respect to women, each generally proposes as follows:
MGTOW: no interaction with women whatsoever
Neomasulinity: selected interaction with women on our own terms
Speaking for myself, MGTOW is not a solution because it doesn't allow for procreation. Taken to an extreme, all this will do is eventually remove Alpha male genes from the gene pool.
Neomasculinity, on the other hand, does allow for propagation of Dominant Alpha genes.
The central question at hand for the Neomasculine philosophy, gentlemen, is:
What are the terms to be for "selected interaction" with women?
I look forward to hearing from Roosh, and our other thought leaders, on what these might be.
She feels that this is wrong. Instead, she feels men should be completely MGTOW, and "get a sense of self worth and validation without the approval of women". She goes on to say that men should "completely shut women out of [their] life".
In actual fact, the central thesis to her diatribe is the philosophical battle between MGTOW and Neomasculinity.
With respect to women, each generally proposes as follows:
MGTOW: no interaction with women whatsoever
Neomasulinity: selected interaction with women on our own terms
Speaking for myself, MGTOW is not a solution because it doesn't allow for procreation. Taken to an extreme, all this will do is eventually remove Alpha male genes from the gene pool.
Neomasculinity, on the other hand, does allow for propagation of Dominant Alpha genes.
The central question at hand for the Neomasculine philosophy, gentlemen, is:
What are the terms to be for "selected interaction" with women?
I look forward to hearing from Roosh, and our other thought leaders, on what these might be.