Quote: (07-31-2015 02:13 AM)Phoenix Wrote:
Quote: (07-31-2015 01:36 AM)Akula Wrote:
WTF is an "Article 4 Free Inhabitant" she keeps talking about anyway?
LOL, its from the articles of confederation. She's probably one of those loons who thinks the constitution is invalid and didn't supercede the articles for some reason.
Maybe she's part of the "freeman on the land" movement...
Quote:Quote:
"Freemen" believe that statute law is a contract, and that individuals can therefore opt out of statute law, choosing instead to live under what they call "common" (case) and "natural" laws
Freemen will try to claim common law (as opposed to admiralty law) jurisdiction by asking "Do you have a claim against me?" This, they contend, removes their consent to be governed by admiralty law and turns the court into a common law court, so that proceedings would have to go forward according to their version of common law.
None of the beliefs held by Freemen have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases
The videos of these people in court are quite funny. They often claim victory when the judge has had enough nonsense and walks out, and the followers take that as "proof", with no mention of the fact that they eventually lost of course.
Edit- I see suits already posted similar above
Americans are dreamers too