Quote: (06-07-2015 08:08 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Tuth: the fact is, if women are just slutting it up, chasing careers, and never having kids then the supply of young pussy and new sluts will keep decreasing until the trends reverse. Supply and demand.
Even though I'm hesitant to apply the rules of marketplace to everything, there's no single thing in the world to which they apply more than pussy. So you're right. Unfortunately, these market corrections may not happen quickly enough for our sexual lifetimes. We haven't reached peak slut, and things are looking bad as is. Basically we caught the last crumbs of the golden age of slutdom--I'd say the period right before you didn't need a .edu address to join Facebook, and internet access on your phone was so primitive you gave up midway through most searches.
Ideally, I'd say, you want a configuration with these features:
- Get bangs in 2-3 dates (not too quickly, not too slow)
- No embrace of "sex positivism" (i.e., being a slut was still in the closet)
- No "fluency in sarcasm" as a good thing (being unpleasant wasn't rewarded as much)
- No smartphones (bitches had to call you back)
- No two-sided cameras in the pockets of every woman
- Lower obesity rates (no bottleneck on non-fat 6s)
- No "rape culture" and/or "consent" alarmism (girls weren't terrified of all men)
- Egos fitting a girl's station (no laundry lists of demands)
- Fewer slut bailouts (Plan B pill, IUDs for regular girls)
- No walking around 24/7 with headphones or making phone calls
- No cat epidemic (de-stigmatization of lazy proxies for nurturing instinct)
- No online male thirst
- No easy approaches for socially awkward men
- Porn was scarce, hard to get, or low quality
- No stigma on having game or being a "ladies' man"
- No criminalization of healthy amounts of "bullying" (correction of deviant, weird, or not-minding-your-own-business behaviors)
- No attempt to redefine beauty to conform to the consequences of largely lazy and irresponsible behaviors
It seems to me the peak for this might have been the mid 80s to mid 90s. Before that, you get those great-looking late 1960s and 70s chicks, but a lot more demands for marriage and stigma for very basic single-guy behavior (watch an episode of Three's Company to see what I mean). Starting in the late 90s, you see the quick succession of cell phones, MySpace, headsets for cell phones, the advent of texting, etc.; The capstone to that steady decline was Facebook, 24/7 connectivity in your pocket, and the de-stigmatization of online dating.
So when you see the beginning of commercial "game" (1999/2000-ish), that was already a response to conditions that required elaborate adaptations to increasingly unfavorable conditions. Sure, game has always existed, but the new game was about hacking the brave new world of emboldened and declining women.
Of course, none of that early work talked about iPhone addiction or the 15-20 male models hitting up the same okay-looking girl through a simplified dating app that requires very little effort from women, apart from uploading 1-2 flattering pictures of herself, and accessible 365 days a year. That's where places like this forum come into the picture, where guys are having to adapt and innovate with increasing speed (and difficulty) to squeeze out a little more juice from the lemon.
I'm starting to think the guys who bounced from the states early in the going were the smartest, though I'm starting to hear that the cancer is spreading everywhere. Roosh, for example, tweets concerning information about the "good parts" of the world with more frequency now:
Not to be gloom and doom--I'll continue to adapt and hack the system--but I'm starting to wonder whether we need to resolve ourselves that our children will be born either out of wedlock or to some jungle woman deep in the wilderness where she "only" gets two bars on her iPhone 23.