[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-16-2015 01:41 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

(05-15-2015 06:24 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

This chart posted by Lizard King is the most important one posted on this thread, and it's tantamount to understand why a place such as the UK, has managed to fully absorb its immigrants into the labour force. And why a place such as Sweden, a feminist socialist paradise, has completely and utterly failed.

America for all it's troubles, just like Canada, the UK, and Australia has managed to fully absorb its immigrants into the labour market successfully. Does the Anglo system offer and advantage when it comes to absorption of newcomers? Can it be replicated? This is the sort of questions policy makers will grapple with in the next few decades.

If you haven't seen it, check out the Red Ice video: "Insight - A New Stockholm To Be Built Within 6 Years"

http://www.redicecreations.com/TV/2015/I...ckholm.php

There are some very choice comments from the Swedish élite (who of course live nowhere near multiculturally enriched areas and who certainly do not send their children to schools requiring Swedish translators) who openly mention that the native population is to be replaced.

The Anglo labour markets are low waged, low security, hire and fire in nature with labour unions caring more about transgender WCs at work and hoping that the workers of the world will unite through the multicult experiment. This is why cheap labour is quickly absorbed there.

Exactly - in the UK there is even competition at higher levels with well-educated young men from India, Greece or even EE flooding better positions in the City. HR managers told me that sometimes the only candidates left for some positions are from Oxford, Greece and India. Do you think that the Indian and Greek guy have the same wage demands as the one coming from Oxford?

Wage pressure is happening even at jobs of 70k+ net. The rest as No6 has correctly put it are low level jobs with race-to-the-bottom-pay that cannot be edged higher because the unions are a thing of the past.

The real unemployment numbers are terrible in all countries with massive immigration. Governments are using plenty of faulty statistics. Yes - Sweden has a high wage structure that barely bends and they don't create those working-poor jobs as much. But all countries suffer.

Recently the Gallup CEO jokingly mentioned on CNBC that if he would ever question the government jobless statistics, then he would suddenly disappear.



http://wallstreetonparade.com/2015/02/ga...jobs-data/

Even the bloody head of the Bank of England says openly that immigrants are dragging down wages and are thus reducing massively disposable income. At lower levels unions are becoming ever more ineffective and at higher levels you just have lower bargaining power. The only party who are winning are huge corporations. But since the purchasing strength of the entire population is diminishing then there are only the bare essentials which are striving: rental properties, minimum level consumer products and the branches catering to the rich. Essentially the Western countries are becoming more extreme in income distribution and the middle class is disappearing.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-year.html

I will drop a few stats here and just let it go - reminding everyone that I don't accuse the immigrants. They do what they can to have a better life. But no - they are not creating a better life for the indigenous population by coming over - not at current economic climate. Little known fact - the US is contrary to popular opinion not a country of immigrants. While it is true that 200.000 people were coming over yearly for decades, the reality is that the vast overwhelming population growth was created by the new Americans having 10+ children. The massive immigration barely registered. The pendulum swung only in the 1960s after the pill and fertility dropped. Also by then immigration revved up to 500k, then 1 mio, now reaching over 2 mio+ each year (legal and illegal) in the US.


   
Income distribution.


Real unemployment - with the current statistics many people are excluded from the job front - those who stopped looking, those who are on some kind of benefits, those who had a job that kept them 6-15 hours employed and netted them 3000-10000$/year. Yeah - you heard it right a 6 hour/week job counts as a good solid middle class 50k job in the US statistics. And yes the Gallup CEO would indeed mysteriously disappear if he ever started stating the obvious too loudly. At least in the West there is social security or there would be big riots already.