Some guys here give simply unrealistically low numbers for acceptable or even attractive girls.
I ask myself how this comes. Do you have a "model only" game? No guy I've met so far (even the top looking "natural" guys with tight game) can afford to have a "model only" game.
For example, the readhead who was voted a 3 by Luckystar. If she's slender (you can't figure that out on the picture 100%), no guy I know (not even the top guys) would turn down a sex offer from her IN REALITY (whatever guys might say about her on an internet forum).
Tell me about the girls you game, if this is an ugly (not average, but ugly) woman for you. How come that your standards are so much higher than the REAL-LIFE standards from every guy I know?
Do you have field reports on this forum? I'm really curious.
(The girls far left and far right on the "foursome" picture are beasts, though.)
I ask myself how this comes. Do you have a "model only" game? No guy I've met so far (even the top looking "natural" guys with tight game) can afford to have a "model only" game.
For example, the readhead who was voted a 3 by Luckystar. If she's slender (you can't figure that out on the picture 100%), no guy I know (not even the top guys) would turn down a sex offer from her IN REALITY (whatever guys might say about her on an internet forum).
Tell me about the girls you game, if this is an ugly (not average, but ugly) woman for you. How come that your standards are so much higher than the REAL-LIFE standards from every guy I know?
Do you have field reports on this forum? I'm really curious.
(The girls far left and far right on the "foursome" picture are beasts, though.)