Been chewing on this for awhile, gotta get it out there. Before everyone gets the troll smilies out: I know I might be violating Poe's Law. Please don't ban me. This bit of logic will serve as a cliff's notes version of my argument:
One of the first things that any man will learn about game is that women will often complain the loudest about the things they like the most in men. Any guy that has been friendzoned will hear his "friend" complain about her asshole uncaring boyfriend. Why is she with this guy? Because he's an asshole uncaring alpha cad. How does the guy in the friendzone "fix" this problem? By being nice and listening to what she says. What should he do? He should become the asshole uncaring alpha cad.
So here we go. Let's apply this principle from the small scale (micro) to the large scale (macro): feminists (and women) complain about the patriarchy. How do we fix women complaining about the patriarchy?
For the last 100 years (and even further) in the West we've "fixed" women's problems with the "patriarchy" by giving them more rights. We've given them the right to vote in a universal democracy. We've made hiring them for jobs a priority. We've listened to their complaints about male behavior and instituted behavioral and language restrictions everywhere in media, academia, professional life, and personal life. We've elevated them to the principal raisers of children. We give them the benefit of the doubt in all situations. We've listened to their every want and need and bent over backwards.
But, are women in the West happy?
They aren't happy at all. Take a few minutes and scratch the surface and most women in the West are miserable. And it has nothing to do with how much money they make or anything else. They are just unhappy. (if you've read Heartiste at all you can put the proper emphasis on unhappy). Why?
Big Bad Beta West is dominant in the world. It makes a ton of money. It can afford to give its girls everything they want. They can be big and fat and still be beautiful, they can "have it all", they don't need to confront their own fertility as a limited span, they can be respected and still be sexy, their voices matter above all else. Why are Beta West's women so unhappy?
Beta West has made a noob mistake. Beta West has listened to woman as a man and judged her as a man and tries to give her what a man needs. But a woman is not a man.
If you want to apply game at a small scale (micro-gamenomics for you future college professors), when talking to a girl at a bar or in class or at the grocery store or anywhere else, it is foremost that you appreciate her as a woman. But, somehow in the West, when we go to the large scale (macro-gamenomics) we see women the same as men. It's obvious that an individual woman is not a man. It should also be obvious that collectively women do not become men or think like men or act like men.
The solution to many women bitching about patriarchy is the same as the solution to a single woman bitching about your dominance. It's a shit test. The wrong answer is giving in. Do I need to fill in the rest?
The West has collectively failed the largest shit test in the history of competitive sexual reproduction.
And it continues to fail, just like the friendzoned beta tries to be nicer than the asshole boyfriend but never gets laid. The only way out of such a situation as an individual man is to reclaim your dominance as a man.
So what is the solution for men? Take what works on the small scale and apply it to the large scale. Reclaim your dominance. There's a word for that: Patriarchy.
Men should be making the decisions. This is delightfully simple. When you meet a cute girl, if you don't make the decisions, she thinks less of you. When pressed, women will say how much they don't respect a man that keeps appealing to them. Let's apply this small simple truth to the large scale. Men should be making the decisions. Let's bring back the patriarchy.
Let's do game on the macro level. Seriously. Not just with the one night stands, not just with your wife. You can't say that game works and not understand what it entails: Men are the decision makers. Men should be dominant. Men should step up to the plate and take all life has to reward them or shit on them.
Easy enough? How about this: You can't have a society that is based on what women say they need and want. Men can and should disregard what women say they need and want. And it is the men in that society that are to praise or to blame for when society crumbles. Giving women the right to vote is a bad idea.
Patriarchy is macro-game. This is why people who start with "how can I get laid" inevitably end up with "what is wrong with society". It's the same concept applied to a larger scale. And, it's no surprise that now, when women have more power than ever, they are complaining about the very things they are missing.
Bring back macro-game, bring back patriarchy.
One of the first things that any man will learn about game is that women will often complain the loudest about the things they like the most in men. Any guy that has been friendzoned will hear his "friend" complain about her asshole uncaring boyfriend. Why is she with this guy? Because he's an asshole uncaring alpha cad. How does the guy in the friendzone "fix" this problem? By being nice and listening to what she says. What should he do? He should become the asshole uncaring alpha cad.
So here we go. Let's apply this principle from the small scale (micro) to the large scale (macro): feminists (and women) complain about the patriarchy. How do we fix women complaining about the patriarchy?
For the last 100 years (and even further) in the West we've "fixed" women's problems with the "patriarchy" by giving them more rights. We've given them the right to vote in a universal democracy. We've made hiring them for jobs a priority. We've listened to their complaints about male behavior and instituted behavioral and language restrictions everywhere in media, academia, professional life, and personal life. We've elevated them to the principal raisers of children. We give them the benefit of the doubt in all situations. We've listened to their every want and need and bent over backwards.
But, are women in the West happy?
They aren't happy at all. Take a few minutes and scratch the surface and most women in the West are miserable. And it has nothing to do with how much money they make or anything else. They are just unhappy. (if you've read Heartiste at all you can put the proper emphasis on unhappy). Why?
Big Bad Beta West is dominant in the world. It makes a ton of money. It can afford to give its girls everything they want. They can be big and fat and still be beautiful, they can "have it all", they don't need to confront their own fertility as a limited span, they can be respected and still be sexy, their voices matter above all else. Why are Beta West's women so unhappy?
Beta West has made a noob mistake. Beta West has listened to woman as a man and judged her as a man and tries to give her what a man needs. But a woman is not a man.
If you want to apply game at a small scale (micro-gamenomics for you future college professors), when talking to a girl at a bar or in class or at the grocery store or anywhere else, it is foremost that you appreciate her as a woman. But, somehow in the West, when we go to the large scale (macro-gamenomics) we see women the same as men. It's obvious that an individual woman is not a man. It should also be obvious that collectively women do not become men or think like men or act like men.
The solution to many women bitching about patriarchy is the same as the solution to a single woman bitching about your dominance. It's a shit test. The wrong answer is giving in. Do I need to fill in the rest?
The West has collectively failed the largest shit test in the history of competitive sexual reproduction.
And it continues to fail, just like the friendzoned beta tries to be nicer than the asshole boyfriend but never gets laid. The only way out of such a situation as an individual man is to reclaim your dominance as a man.
So what is the solution for men? Take what works on the small scale and apply it to the large scale. Reclaim your dominance. There's a word for that: Patriarchy.
Men should be making the decisions. This is delightfully simple. When you meet a cute girl, if you don't make the decisions, she thinks less of you. When pressed, women will say how much they don't respect a man that keeps appealing to them. Let's apply this small simple truth to the large scale. Men should be making the decisions. Let's bring back the patriarchy.
Let's do game on the macro level. Seriously. Not just with the one night stands, not just with your wife. You can't say that game works and not understand what it entails: Men are the decision makers. Men should be dominant. Men should step up to the plate and take all life has to reward them or shit on them.
Easy enough? How about this: You can't have a society that is based on what women say they need and want. Men can and should disregard what women say they need and want. And it is the men in that society that are to praise or to blame for when society crumbles. Giving women the right to vote is a bad idea.
Patriarchy is macro-game. This is why people who start with "how can I get laid" inevitably end up with "what is wrong with society". It's the same concept applied to a larger scale. And, it's no surprise that now, when women have more power than ever, they are complaining about the very things they are missing.
Bring back macro-game, bring back patriarchy.