rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


How do you come off as "intense" if modern game is being a clown?
#16

How do you come off as "intense" if modern game is being a clown?

I think the problem with reconciling different types of game comes from the fact that Mystery lead to Neil Strauss led to Roissy led to Roosh led to ...

There is more than one type of game. More than one type of woman. The cultural meme of the Manosphere is there's a one type fits all woman and a one type fits all game. It's not correct.

That's not to say Roosh and Roissy (and other people who are obviously better at game and know what they're talking about far more than I do) are wrong, just that their approach isn't the only one.

The aloof, cocky funny approach is successful in most cases, so that's the current ruling paradigm. In MMA, the current ruling paradigm is dirty boxing and wrestling: It's the most successful combination by far, and nearly all the champions use a similar style.

Is it the only one though? No. Lyota Machida has a different strategy. Cruz has a different strategy. Back to game: you're going to be that different strategy. You might want to look up XSplat's blog. He's very much an intense, emotional, fall-in-love-possessive guy. Completely different approach to cocky-funny game.

It isn't about reconciling the two and having a mix of the two. It's about picking which strategy for which girl (or guy or business.) Keep the two different, run split tests and see which one suits you better. Then tihnk about drilling down for more specific techniques and tricks.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)