Players, I wonder if you can come up with some new formulas using the same principles that I have used.
My first statement gets her to qualify herself to me. The second one conveys sexual intent but at the same time acts as a false disqualifier and builds intrigue to get her hamster spinning. Third one is CF cheekiness.
Note how I immediately follow-up a CF or escalatory statement with a logical question. This proactively preempts any reactive resistance on her part, by immediately disengaging her from the sexual/emotional spike of such statement, and leads her to qualify for the next challenge (wait, you're not like 13... / gotta be wearin the right clothes...).
By then she knows what's up and it's time to escalate, escalate, escalate.
I can't wait to test this on Tinder but their SMS verification is an utter failure and I can't get past the damn thing despite trying LM McCoy's workaround.
My first statement gets her to qualify herself to me. The second one conveys sexual intent but at the same time acts as a false disqualifier and builds intrigue to get her hamster spinning. Third one is CF cheekiness.
Note how I immediately follow-up a CF or escalatory statement with a logical question. This proactively preempts any reactive resistance on her part, by immediately disengaging her from the sexual/emotional spike of such statement, and leads her to qualify for the next challenge (wait, you're not like 13... / gotta be wearin the right clothes...).
By then she knows what's up and it's time to escalate, escalate, escalate.
I can't wait to test this on Tinder but their SMS verification is an utter failure and I can't get past the damn thing despite trying LM McCoy's workaround.