Here's an interesting subject, worthy of a glance.
CNN has this little blurb about "sugar daddies" and "sugar babies."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/living/lis...?hpt=hp_t5
What's interesting about it is the following:
1. It presents women's desires as high-minded and noble, and men's desires as base and contemptible.
2. It tries to rationalize away the very real desire for some women to have a man support them. In the view of Lisa Ling at CNN, a woman's career trumps all. Women should be ashamed of any hint of thinking in a traditional way.
3. It proves once again how important game is as a way of short-circuiting the expectations of society.
CNN has this little blurb about "sugar daddies" and "sugar babies."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/living/lis...?hpt=hp_t5
What's interesting about it is the following:
1. It presents women's desires as high-minded and noble, and men's desires as base and contemptible.
2. It tries to rationalize away the very real desire for some women to have a man support them. In the view of Lisa Ling at CNN, a woman's career trumps all. Women should be ashamed of any hint of thinking in a traditional way.
3. It proves once again how important game is as a way of short-circuiting the expectations of society.