[Tytalus]

(06-13-2014 06:19 PM)Hopson Wrote:  

This seems so simple, if we are going to legally force some man to financially support a child then FORCE THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER. What is so fucking confusing about that? Only liberal dipshits would be so conflicted about who should be paying for a child. The only issue should be whether or not the cuckolded guy has a legal right to visit the real father's kid.

Also, I don't think any man should have a legal obligation to support any child necessarily - not as long as women can abort children without consent of fathers. NO SAY? NO PAY.

I'm actually of the opinion that men who are victim of paternity fraud should sue the mother and the bio father for fraud and emotional damages.