Some people in the "red pill" seem to believe in free-market capitalism, and see feminism as an offshoot of leftist forces. Undoubtedly, most self-identified feminists are leftists.
However, the most "feminine" women are largely found in "traditional" societies, ie Latin America/South-East Asia, or in Post-Communist ones.
Careerist women obviously are much less feminine.
Would you support an economic system, Capitalism, which necessarily leads to women becoming less feminine?
Latin America's economic system certainly seems less efficient in terms of producing material wealth. Yet their women are undoubtedly more feminine, divorce rates are lower. There are advantages to this, in maintaining traditional families.
Is it worth sacrificing traditional families and traditional women for more material wealth?
However, the most "feminine" women are largely found in "traditional" societies, ie Latin America/South-East Asia, or in Post-Communist ones.
Careerist women obviously are much less feminine.
Would you support an economic system, Capitalism, which necessarily leads to women becoming less feminine?
Latin America's economic system certainly seems less efficient in terms of producing material wealth. Yet their women are undoubtedly more feminine, divorce rates are lower. There are advantages to this, in maintaining traditional families.
Is it worth sacrificing traditional families and traditional women for more material wealth?