67 year old unemployed pharmacist jailed because he "should" have $4000 per month to pay ex wife.
It's the nightmare of "imputed income" A bitchy female judge in Massachusetts ( probably an ugly neglected bitch) told him "You're a success, you should have the money " because he had a startup several years ago which failed.
He provided copies of the unsuccessful applications to the pharmacies where he applied. There's no reason or rules of evidence in family court.
He was a Marine veteran, let away in chains because he "should" have money. Presumption of guilt or hiding assets. He's half Cherokee and fled to a
reservation in the West so he won't be arrested in Massachusetts.
She violated the rule that after retirement age, the judge is supposed to provide a written explanation why a payer should have to keep providing alimony
http://goo.gl/qfBeUN
It's the nightmare of "imputed income" A bitchy female judge in Massachusetts ( probably an ugly neglected bitch) told him "You're a success, you should have the money " because he had a startup several years ago which failed.
He provided copies of the unsuccessful applications to the pharmacies where he applied. There's no reason or rules of evidence in family court.
He was a Marine veteran, let away in chains because he "should" have money. Presumption of guilt or hiding assets. He's half Cherokee and fled to a
reservation in the West so he won't be arrested in Massachusetts.
She violated the rule that after retirement age, the judge is supposed to provide a written explanation why a payer should have to keep providing alimony
http://goo.gl/qfBeUN