rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Federal Reserve September FOMC Meeting: Taper or No Taper
#9

Federal Reserve September FOMC Meeting: Taper or No Taper

Quote: (09-19-2013 12:10 AM)CactusCat589 Wrote:  

It was manipulated, I described the April smash here in detail: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-15889-...pid504652. I think there was another barrage of futures contracts recently, but haven't looked into it.

I want to point out that the culprits in precious metals suppression are the same primary dealers who are by law the only entities allowed to act as counterparties to both the Fed and the Treasury:

One guy I find interesting who has talked about manipulation in the metals market is Ted Butler here is what he recently wrote.

Quote:Quote:

Based upon COT and Bank Participation Reports data, last December 4, JPMorgan had a net short position in COMEX gold futures of approximately 75,000 contracts. This position represented 20.5% of the true net open interest on that date (once 68,648 spread contracts were removed from total open interest of 434,416 contracts). On that date, the price of gold was $1700. While it is difficult for many (including the CFTC) to grasp the concept that a corner could exist on the short side of the market, surely no one would argue against a 20.5% concentrated share of a major regulated futures market by a single entity would constitute manipulation and a corner.

It was this corner on the short side of COMEX gold futures by JPMorgan that provided the incentive and led to the subsequent $500 decline in the price of gold into the end of June. On the historic price decline in gold over the first half of 2013, JPMorgan booked profits on their short side gold market corner (of over $2 billion in my estimate) and continued to rig prices lower in order to establish their current long side corner of 85,000 contracts, or 25% of the true net open interest in COMEX gold futures (minus spreads).
You can’t go from being 75,000 contracts (7.5 million oz) net short to 85,000 contracts (8.5 million oz) net long in an instant or in a week or a month. You can’t snap your fingers and buy the equivalent of 16 million oz of gold, regardless of whether you have the money to leverage derivatives with a notional value of $25 billion. It took JPMorgan nine months to buy 160,000 net COMEX gold futures contracts (16 million oz), at an average monthly rate of around 18,000 contracts (1.8 million oz) from Dec 4 thru today.

Quote:Quote:

There can be no question that the price pattern over the past nine months has benefitted JPMorgan immensely. A short corner on the gold market at $1700 and now a long corner many of hundreds of dollars lower. Just a coincidence or strong supporting evidence of manipulation? Either JPM is the luckiest trading entity in history or they are exerting undue control on the gold (and silver market).

If JP Morgan is now long gold and it has a history of manipulating the metals market how likely is it that they will once again be on the winning side of future price action in the metals?

Game/red pill article links

"Chicks dig power, men dig beauty, eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap, men are expendable, women are perishable." - Heartiste
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)