Sounds like junk science to me. Also framing 'nurturing' as a better 'family man'.
There is no such thing as a successful species that doesn't want to breed.
Higher T, thus you'd assume bigger testicle men, are how evolution shaped 'more successful' men. They couldn't have remained successful if they didn't want kids AND impose manhood on their sons.
Higher T men should want kids, the most healthy sexual response for any male is to look at an attractive women and think "I want to get her pregnant".
However, being a good father, or family man, isn't about changing nappies 50% of the time. it's about imparting masculine ideals into sons, and shaping their role within a masculine framework with daughters.
Low T guys would have women run the house, and daughters disrespect him, ultimately that's a dysfunctional family.
There is no such thing as a successful species that doesn't want to breed.
Higher T, thus you'd assume bigger testicle men, are how evolution shaped 'more successful' men. They couldn't have remained successful if they didn't want kids AND impose manhood on their sons.
Higher T men should want kids, the most healthy sexual response for any male is to look at an attractive women and think "I want to get her pregnant".
However, being a good father, or family man, isn't about changing nappies 50% of the time. it's about imparting masculine ideals into sons, and shaping their role within a masculine framework with daughters.
Low T guys would have women run the house, and daughters disrespect him, ultimately that's a dysfunctional family.