Gay marriage is an assault on power.
if homosexuals were after reciprocal property rights, entitlements to pensions, etc, then civil unions would have sufficed.
They particularly want the label 'marriage' as to be put on equal terms with religous groups, for no other reason that to disempower religious groups, whose conservatism has been a traditional foe. Once married, so f*cking what
Historically marriage was something that institutionally pair bonded a man with a women, with the prospect of dire conseeuqnces of breaking the bond.
This was a measure to minimise the chances that betas didn't get cuckholded, but it also ensured that a low value woman, i.e. post-menopausal, who was the least valuable member of the tribe, didn't get abandonded for something younger, hotter, tighter. The ceremony was about a woman's submission to a man, that she would succumb to his leading force.
Now, well its a fancy dress party that locks in the value of a pussy for ever. Alimony, based on providing a custom of living she is used to?
WTF?!?!
The ability to provide a high standard of living is a facet of attractiveness in a man to a woman. if she is no longer overall attracted to him, I do not see the rationale to acess to the attractive part obligation free... keep the upside was also reducing his attraction for future mates as half of it disappears. Alimony should come with reciprocal conjugal entitlements.
if homosexuals were after reciprocal property rights, entitlements to pensions, etc, then civil unions would have sufficed.
They particularly want the label 'marriage' as to be put on equal terms with religous groups, for no other reason that to disempower religious groups, whose conservatism has been a traditional foe. Once married, so f*cking what
Historically marriage was something that institutionally pair bonded a man with a women, with the prospect of dire conseeuqnces of breaking the bond.
This was a measure to minimise the chances that betas didn't get cuckholded, but it also ensured that a low value woman, i.e. post-menopausal, who was the least valuable member of the tribe, didn't get abandonded for something younger, hotter, tighter. The ceremony was about a woman's submission to a man, that she would succumb to his leading force.
Now, well its a fancy dress party that locks in the value of a pussy for ever. Alimony, based on providing a custom of living she is used to?
WTF?!?!
The ability to provide a high standard of living is a facet of attractiveness in a man to a woman. if she is no longer overall attracted to him, I do not see the rationale to acess to the attractive part obligation free... keep the upside was also reducing his attraction for future mates as half of it disappears. Alimony should come with reciprocal conjugal entitlements.