The articles below describe a deliciously ironic argument where one group of nutters turns on another group of nutters, each trying to out-perform the other in political correctness.
It's funny to see feminists who have spent their lives worshipping at the altar of self-delusion be viciously attacked by fellow progeny of the very ideas they spent their careers pushing. Each shouting at the other I'm more progressive than you!
As the PC attack dogs come out to punish these feminists for their thoughtcrimes, hopefully they're thinking shit, we've created a monster!. A government minister, no less, is apparently calling for the sacking of the editor of the Observer newspaper where the piece appeared. Of course, it would probably be ideologically inconsistent for these feminists to find any fault with censorship in principle.
http://order-order.com/2013/01/14/have-c...have-nots/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...storm.html
The feminists in question resent men becoming women and claiming 'female privileges'. Her resentment is telling: if women were truly underprivileged, they should applaud men cutting off their cocks and joining their ranks. Instead, they complain!
This is hamsterism and intra-liberal ideological warfare at its finest.
Edit: maybe the author of the original piece is resentful because she gets mistaken for a tranny:
![[Image: article-0-03121A280000044D-467_306x423.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/13/article-0-03121A280000044D-467_306x423.jpg)
It's funny to see feminists who have spent their lives worshipping at the altar of self-delusion be viciously attacked by fellow progeny of the very ideas they spent their careers pushing. Each shouting at the other I'm more progressive than you!
As the PC attack dogs come out to punish these feminists for their thoughtcrimes, hopefully they're thinking shit, we've created a monster!. A government minister, no less, is apparently calling for the sacking of the editor of the Observer newspaper where the piece appeared. Of course, it would probably be ideologically inconsistent for these feminists to find any fault with censorship in principle.
http://order-order.com/2013/01/14/have-c...have-nots/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...storm.html
The feminists in question resent men becoming women and claiming 'female privileges'. Her resentment is telling: if women were truly underprivileged, they should applaud men cutting off their cocks and joining their ranks. Instead, they complain!
This is hamsterism and intra-liberal ideological warfare at its finest.
Edit: maybe the author of the original piece is resentful because she gets mistaken for a tranny:
"A flower can not remain in bloom for years, but a garden can be cultivated to bloom throughout seasons and years." - xsplat