[Slavophile]

(06-17-2013 03:48 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

(06-17-2013 01:54 PM)Slavophile Wrote:  

IMO About 2/3 of what comes on RoK is good/ok material.

I would prefer some more differentiation in the categories though. Writing on LA sluts, Las Vegas parties, and bottle service strategies is in IMHO BS for any man interested in the supreme women of Eastern Europe. Many guys on the forum seem to be in to these supreme women, rather than western sluts. Categorizing these articles somehow would be beneficial, given the assumption that there is a significant crossover in the reader audience.

Colombian/Brazilian >>>>> FSU Chicks.

WIA

My best buddy shares your preference.

I have'nt been to Latin America, so I wont make too jugdemental arguments regarding your opinion. If your profile input for "countries visited" are up to date, it seem's like you have'nt been to the promised land of EE either...

I'll agree on this:

Latin & Slavic women >>>>> western sluts/whores

__________________________________________

What I will make an argument for though:

Regarding - interesting history, culture & politics, language, expatriate opportunities

[Slavic countries] >>>>> ^ 2 [Latin American countries]

__________________________________________

- So getting back to my initial point for RoK, differentiation in categories would be beneficial. Maybe the articles should be tagged with the geographic area for where the "know-how" is considered applicable or is experienced by the author. North America, Western Europe, Latin America, Eastern Europe, + misc.