[Avarence]

Link here. (Includes NSFW photo)

Quote:

SOUTH GLENS FALLS — Police are trying to determine whether allowing strippers at a 16-year-old's birthday party is illegal or just a case of bad parenting.
A Nov. 3 party at Spare Time Bowling Alley featured two exotic dancers, with attendees as young as 14 witnessing their performances. The dancers did not fully disrobe but stripped to thong underwear and bras. A photo taken by one partygoer with a cellphone camera shows a stripper with her legs wrapped around the guest's head and her head between his knees as others watch.
District Attorney James Murphy said two issues are being investigated: whether the welfare of minors was endangered and whether the bowling alley violated its liquor license.
The dancers were in a separate room in the bowling alley, with butcher paper covering the windows and the glass on the door, he said, but witnesses as young as 14 were present and saw the performances. Police are withholding the names of the parents while the investigation is done.
"There were 80 people at this event. There certainly are plenty of witnesses," Murphy said. "It's going to take some time as to who saw what."
South Glens Falls Police Chief Kevin Dunn said investigators are questioning witnesses to determine exactly what happened.
"The plan of attack is to interview everybody who was there," he said. "It's going to take some time. We're still looking into it and contacting people."
People answering the phone at both the bowling alley and Tops in Bottom, the business that provided the dancers, said no one would comment.
Defense Attorney Cheryl Coleman said endangering the welfare of a child is a broadly written statute, but she doubts allowing a teen to get a lap dance violates it.
"It's sure not something I would have done for my son at 16," she said. "We involve the government and criminal justice system in far too much. The endangering the welfare law is really vague. If you use the same logic, you could charge people with it for taking their child to McDonald's several times a week."
Coleman said she also thinks the fact the strippers did not bare all may protect the parents from legal trouble.
"Probably they shouldn't win the Parent of the Year award," she said. "It might be stupid but it's not illegal."
But Murphy said it depends on what contact was made, even if the strippers kept their underwear on.
"The statute says touching of the private area through clothing is a Class A misdemeanor," he said. "Bad parenting isn't a crime but endangering the welfare of a child is."

A commenter claimed this taught the boys to "objectify women at a young age."

My response:

These women are strippers. They chose that career path. They objectified themselves. These lucky teenage bastards are just reaping the benefits by watching them work their bodies. I'm sure they learned more at this party about their own and the female sexual anatomies than at any scare-tactic 7th grade health class. Paying for sex is a desperation move, but this isn't sex, it's entertainment. And there's nothing wrong with growing up and becoming men a little early.

Advantage: Red Pill Parents.

Thoughts?