[Excelsior]

(08-28-2012 09:03 AM)basilransom Wrote:  

While Anglo countries may be the weakest when it comes to how their men treat women, it doesn't follow that the white men within it are the weakest as well.

Well...

Quote:

While Anglo countries may be the weakest when it comes to how their men treat women

...with this reality acknowledged, how exactly does one avoid that conclusion?
In most Anglo-Countries (the majority of which are far less diverse than the still clearly white dominated USA),there is really only one major group that has done most of the lawmaking and cultural engineering of said nations. The things we in the manosphere spend so much time complaining about (feminist influence on the laws, media, and politics of these societies) certainly weren't brought about the minorities in these societies. They aren't writing the laws and allowing feminists into their halls of power-they have had no leverage with which to do this.

Quote:

Are black and Hispanic men more beta, because their women are fat single mothers with major attitude, and they can't do shit about it? Are Asian men because they're less aggressive and less desired by women? Or white men, because their women are careerist feminists?

Black and some hispanic men have a thirstiness issue, and the concerns with Asian males are well documented. I can acknowledge the flaws of other groups while still acknowledging degrees of difference between them.

The fact is that no group has done more to aid the feminine imperative than Anglo-European men. They drew up most of the laws we bitch about, the largely female entitlements we bitch about (ex: welfare, which btw is a fairly large factor in the existence of said fat/loud/entitled black and hispanic hoodrat women you mentioned), create/promote most of the somewhat emasculating/anti-male media we bitch about, and by and large are the most commonly represented within male feminist and white-knight ranks (the epicenters of which are generally SWPL dominated).

Who else has done more to advance feminist ambition? Who else had had the power to do more to advance said ambition?

Quote:

I see some people wanting to pile on white men, and ignore the flaws of other men. This 'men of color' triumphalism is misguided and simply false.

Anglo-European white men, with some help from other North-Central European Germanic folk (Germans and Scandis mainly). These people have created some of the most advanced but heavily beta/white-knight/ballbusting-feminist infested societies on Earth. I merely argue that this is not a coincidence, but rather a common cultural thread that ought to be looked into (I'm sure many would like to ask "why" this is).

Southern European men have had less of a hand in this, and Eastern European men even less so. Their men are more apt to be men and they spend less time worrying about serving the feminine imperative (hence the existence of the likes of Putin or Berlusconi, both of whose personas would never be seen at the helm of a modern Anglosphere nation). Their balls are as intact as anyone else's, so this cannot be called merely a "white man" problem. That's too simple.

It is a cultural problem.